ArticlePloS one2026
Web-based Cellpose‑SAM segmentation enables quantification of cross-sectional area in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded skeletal muscle sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cross‑sectional area (CSA) of skeletal myofibers is a primary morphometric indicator of atrophy and regeneration, yet it is most commonly quantified on cryosections after immunofluorescent labeling of basal lamina proteins, which requires specialized reagents and equipment and limits reuse of routine histology slides. Here we present a practical, fully web‑based workflow that leverages Cellpose‑SAM on a public browser interface to segment myofibers directly from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) skeletal muscle sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or toluidine blue (TB), followed by downstream region‑of‑interest (ROI) curation and batch morphometry in Fiji/ImageJ. We validated this approach across whole muscles and tissue preparations in mice. In exemplar experiments on both FFPE and frozen sections of mouse soleus, CSA distributions from H&E and TB showed no significant differences. A sciatic nerve crush injury model exhibited a significant reduction in mean and median CSA in mouse soleus sections with a characteristic left-shift in distribution relative to sham controls, consistent with rapid denervation atrophy. This accessible pipeline lowers experimental barriers, enables analysis of archived H&E or TB slides, and supports reproducible, high-throughput morphometry for neuromuscular research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.