ArticlePloS one2026
Uncovering traditional retail location competition with machine learning: The role of urban environments in light-asset and capital-intensive formats.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding spatial competition between retail formats is vital for sustaining urban commercial vitality. In China's rapidly evolving urban economy, the contrast between light‑asset and capital‑intensive formats within traditional retail has been increasingly shaped by urban redevelopment and changing consumer behavior. However, prior studies largely confine themselves to linear assumptions, neglecting nonlinear dynamics and complex interdependencies. They also lack systematic comparisons between light-asset and capital-intensive formats, especially when attempting to integrate objective urban features with perceptual dimensions. This study investigates how objective urban environment indicators and human perception jointly shape the spatial density of two traditional retail formats, light‑asset (convenience stores) and capital‑intensive (large-scale supermarkets and shopping malls), in Shenzhen, China. Using multi‑source geospatial data and an integrated framework combining XGBoost, SHAP, Partial Dependence Plots (PDP), Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM), and Bayesian Networks (BN), we quantify nonlinear effects, interaction patterns, and probabilistic association pathways. Results reveal distinct locational logics: light‑asset retail thrives through widespread penetration, responding strongly to competition intensity, service‑function proximity, and perceptual synergies; capital‑intensive retail concentrates in high‑yield hubs, driven by facility networks, accessibility, and high‑quality aesthetic environments above defined thresholds. Human perception emerges as a core determinant, accounting for up to 28.95% of explanatory importance, often exerting threshold‑dependent effects. The ISM-BN analysis uncovers multi‑entry vs. sequential pathways to spatial clustering across formats. Findings advance retail location theory by linking built‑environment metrics with street-level perceptual attributes, offering actionable guidance for urban planners to tailor format‑specific, perception‑oriented, and threshold‑sensitive strategies for sustainable retail ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.