Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42766470›Full record

ArticlePsychopathology2026

Enactive Mind Autism: Autopoietic Enactivism as a Practical Framework for Autism Healthcare.

Johannes Cornelis van Huizen, Jan-Pieter Teunisse, Antje Orgassa, Wouter G Staal, Derek W Strijbos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Johannes Cornelis van HuizenSchool of Social Studies, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jan-Pieter TeunisseSchool of Social Studies, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Antje OrgassaSchool of Social Studies, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Wouter G StaalDepartment of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, w.g.staal@fsw.leidenuniv.nl.
Derek W StrijbosFaculty of Philosophy, Theology, and Religious Studies, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAutism healthcare has traditionally focused on individual biological and behavioral factors. In recent decades, there has been growing recognition that the outside world also plays an enabling if not constitutive role in the development of support needs. This broader view complicates healthcare delivery as the traditional person-centered focus 'diffuses' into the environment. An integrative approach, rooted in autopoietic enactivism, can provide guidance here - aimed at establishing stable, authentic, and health-promoting patterns of engagement between an autistic individual and their surroundings. Although the application of autopoietic enactivism has gained popularity among philosophers of psychiatry, its clinical consolidation remains limited.

methodsIn addressing this gap, this paper presents a preliminary practical framework called enactive mind autism (EMA). EMA consists of five dimensions to explore the relevance and implications of an autopoietic-enactive approach in autism healthcare: aspects of (1) ecological, (2) historical, (3) tangible-embodied, (4) intersubjective, and (5) socio-cultural life.

conclusionTo conclude, this paper draws a connection with design research to imagine new methodological directions for clinical research and practice, which, from an autopoietic-enactive perspective, is encouraged to take a phenomenological, pragmatic, and material turn.

Indexed as

AutismComplexityEnactivismSelf-regulationSense-makingSpeculative design

Identifiers

PMID42766470
PMCPMC13690330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.