ArticleMicrobial genomics2026
Nanopore metagenomic sequencing links clinically relevant resistance determinants to pathogens.
Article in Microbial genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Culture-independent metagenomics enables the detection of plasmid-encoded antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes directly from clinical samples; however, the clinical significance of these genes depends on their bacterial host and genomic context, which metagenomics cannot fully infer. Nanopore sequencing technology intrinsically encodes epigenetic modifications such as methylation, which can be leveraged for plasmid-host associations from metagenomic data. Existing methods rely on the recovery of metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs), which can introduce bias towards abundant taxa and leave clinically relevant, low-abundance pathogens unassociated. To address this limitation, we extended methylation-based plasmid-host association from the MAG level to individual assembly contigs and sequencing reads. The Contig- and Unassembled-read-based Pathogen Identification and Delineation (CUPID) pipeline implements the calculation of contig and read similarity scores, which compare weighted mean methylation rates across motifs genetically shared between any contig or read pair. We validated this approach on a mock metagenomic community composed of ten carbapenem-resistant
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.