Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42766299›Full record

ArticleJAMA neurology2026

A Harmonized Visual Reading Framework for Tau PET Staging in Alzheimer Disease.

Emma Ruppert, Marie R Vermeiren, Marina Scop Medeiros, Guilherme Povala, Carolina Soares, Andreia Rocha, Alvaro de Oliveira Franco, Matheus Scarpatto Rodrigues, Markley Oliveira, Rayan Mroué and 21 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Emma RuppertUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Marie R VermeirenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Marina Scop MedeirosUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Guilherme PovalaUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Carolina SoaresUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Andreia RochaUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Alvaro de Oliveira FrancoUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Matheus Scarpatto RodriguesUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Markley OliveiraUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Rayan MrouéUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Pamela C L FerreiraUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Guilherme Bauer-NegriniUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Firoza Z LussierUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Livia AmaralUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Bruna BellaverUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Cécile TissotLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California.
Joseph MasdeuHouston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas.
Dana L TudorascuUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Thomas KarikariUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
David N Soleimani-MeigooniEdward and Pearl Fein Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco.
Juan ForteaSant Pau Memory Unit, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau, Department of Neurology, Hospital de la Santa Creu y Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Val J LoweMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Hwamee OhBrown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Belen PascualHouston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas.
Brian A GordonWashington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Pedro Rosa-NetoMcGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Suzanne BakerLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California.
Rik OssenkoppeleNeurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Elsmarieke van de GiessenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Tharick A PascoalUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
HEAD study

Funding

Longitudinal multicenter head-to-head harmonization of tau PET tracersR01AG073267 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BAKER, SUZANNE L, PASCOAL, THARICK · 2021 to 2025
$41.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG073267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Tau positron emission tomography (PET) can detect and stage Alzheimer disease pathology; however, current binary regulatory-approved visual interpretation focuses on advanced disease, limiting early detection and patient stratification. Objective: To develop and validate a harmonized tau PET visual reading framework across radiotracers that stages tau burden into 5 classes: negative, low, moderate, high, and atypical. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective multicenter cross-sectional study among a cohort with head-to-head tau PET acquisitions was conducted from March 2022 to August 2025 and data analyzed from February to June 2026, with blinded visual reads performed by clinicians. The study was conducted at 9 sites across North America and Europe. Of those individuals enrolled in the HEAD (Head-to-Head Harmonization of Tau Tracers in Alzheimer's Disease) study, a proportion of participants aged 50 to 90 years who completed multitracer tau PET (2-4 scans) and cognitive assessments were included, spanning cognitively unimpaired to dementia. Exposures: Tau PET with 18F-MK-6240 (TAUKLARIFY, n = 681), 18F-flortaucipir (Tauvid, n = 644), 18F-RO948 (n = 150), and 18F-PI-2620 (n = 149); all participants underwent amyloid-β (Aβ) PET and magnetic resonance imaging. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were interrater and intertracer agreement for 5-class tau classification; prevalence ratio (PR) vs the regulatory-approved 18F-flortaucipir framework; and associations with cognition, Aβ burden, and plasma phosphorylated tau 217 (p-tau217). Results: Of 822 individuals enrolled in the HEAD study, 681 participants spanning cognitively unimpaired to dementia were included. Mean (SD) age was 69.3 (8.4) years, and 367 participants (53.9%) were female. The harmonized 5-class framework achieved excellent interrater agreement (κ = 0.77-0.85) and good to excellent intertracer agreement, highest between 18F-MK-6240 and 18F-flortaucipir (κ = 0.88). Compared with the regulatory-approved framework, the harmonized classification identified more tau-positive cognitively unimpaired participants (regulatory-approved binary: 26 of 364 participants; harmonized 18F-flortaucipir: 49 of 364 [PR = 1.89; 95% CI, 1.31-2.70; P = .001]; harmonized 18F-MK-6240: 71 of 364 [PR = 2.73; 95% CI, 1.95-3.83; P < .001]) and those with mild cognitive impairment (regulatory-approved binary: 100 of 223; harmonized 18F-flortaucipir: 123 of 223 [PR = 1.23; 95% CI, 1.12-1.35; P < .001]; harmonized 18F-MK-6240: 142 of 223 [PR = 1.42; 95% CI, 1.27-1.59; P < .001]), with convergence in dementia. Tau burden classes showed stepwise worsening of cognition, Aβ PET burden, and plasma p-tau217, with 1.4-fold, 3.2-fold, and 2.5-fold differences between the low and high tau classes, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: In this prospective multitracer cross-sectional study, a 5-class harmonized tau PET visual reading framework showed high interrater and intertracer agreement and detected more early-stage tau pathology than the regulatory-approved binary approach, with tau burden classes tracking stepwise with cognition and biomarkers. These findings support a standardized, tracer-agnostic framework for diagnostic categorization, therapeutic window identification, and clinical trial stratification.

Identifiers

PMID42766299
PMCPMC13595235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.