Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42766256›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2026

MRI insights into endometrial stromal tumors.

Le Wang, Qi-Wen Hu, Yu Zou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Le WangDepartment of Radiology, Women's Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Qi-Wen HuDepartment of Radiology, Women's Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Yu ZouDepartment of Radiology, Women's Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China. zouyuzju@zju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2922-3334

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preoperative misdiagnosis and the adoption of incorrect surgical approaches occur frequently in patients with endometrial stromal tumors (ESTs) because of their rarity, nonspecific clinical manifestations, and imaging features that highly overlap with those of other benign uterine tumors, thereby increasing the risk of secondary surgery and adverse outcomes. Thus, accurate diagnosis is essential, and following initial clinical and sonographic assessments, MRI serves as the cornerstone imaging technique for further characterization and differential diagnosis. Radiologists must be familiar with and adept at interpreting these images to narrow the differential diagnosis and at least suggest the possibility of EST. This article describes the imaging manifestations of various ESTs and highlights characteristic radiological features that enable radiologists to refine the differential diagnosis, thereby assisting clinicians in determining appropriate treatment strategies. KEY POINTS: Question Preoperative differentiation of ESTs from benign uterine lesions remains challenging and may result in the adoption of the incorrect surgical approach. Findings Key MRI features include homogeneous T2WI hyperintensity without speckles, T2WI hypointense bands, a worm‑like appearance, multilocular cystic changes, and feather‑like enhancement. Critical Relevance Statement This review comprehensively describes the MRI findings of ESTs and provides an educational summary based on tumor location, morphology, and key features to substantially improve diagnostic confidence.

Indexed as

Diagnosis, DifferentialEndometrial stromal tumorsMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID42766256
PMCPMC13594005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.