Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42766255›Full record

ArticleEcoHealth2026

Differences in Ecological Drivers for Leptospira and Hantavirus in an Urban Norway Rat Population.

Caio G Zeppelini, Ana Maria Borges da Paixão Barreto, Diogo C C Santiago, Rafaela S Alves, Viviane F Espírito Santo, Caroline Lacorte Rangel, Renata Carvalho de Oliveira, Daiana de Oliveira, Ianei O Carneiro, Leonela Bazan and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in EcoHealth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Caio G ZeppeliniPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva, Instituto de Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal da Bahia, R. Basílio da Gama, S/N, Salvador, Brazil. czeppelini@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0490-4395
Ana Maria Borges da Paixão BarretoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva, Instituto de Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal da Bahia, R. Basílio da Gama, S/N, Salvador, Brazil.
Diogo C C SantiagoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Saúde, Ambiente e Trabalho, Depto de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina da Bahia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, R. Reitor Miguel Calmon, S/N, Salvador, Brazil.
Rafaela S AlvesPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciência Animal nos Trópicos, Universidade Federal da Bahia, R. Barão do Geremoabo, 147, Salvador, Brazil.
Viviane F Espírito SantoFaculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, R. Barão do Geremoabo, 147, Salvador, Brazil.
Caroline Lacorte RangelFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Brasil, 4365, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Renata Carvalho de OliveiraFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Brasil, 4365, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Daiana de OliveiraFiocruz Bahia, R. Waldemar Falcão, 121, Salvador, Brazil.
Ianei O CarneiroEscola de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária PreventivaL Produção Animal, R. Barão do Geremoabo, 147, Salvador, Brazil.
Leonela BazanPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia: Teoria, Aplicações e Valores, Universidade Federal da Bahia, R. Barão do Geremoabo, 147, Salvador, Brazil.
Max EyreLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Federico CostaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva, Instituto de Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal da Bahia, R. Basílio da Gama, S/N, Salvador, Brazil.
Michael BegonPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva, Instituto de Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal da Bahia, R. Basílio da Gama, S/N, Salvador, Brazil.
Hussein KhalilDepartment of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 901 83, Umeå, Sweden.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P024084/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rodent control in urban areas is an important public health measure, among other reasons, for their capacity of harboring several zoonotic pathogens. Efficient, evidence-based control programs must consider both rodent and pathogen ecology, to achieve both rodent population and pathogen transmission risk reduction. The present study aims to determine the ecological drivers of Leptospira and Hantavirus positivity in an urban Norway Rat population. One hundred and twenty rats were trapped in four urban poor communities in Salvador, Brazil, tested for Leptospira sp. and Hantavirus. Generalized Linear Models for Leptospira (N=109) and Hantavirus (N=108) positivity were created with a pool of environmental and demographic variables, followed by stepwise model selection using Akaike's Information Criterion. Age, presence of Calodium hepaticum scars, wounds, accumulated materials, open sewer canals and unpaved soil were positively associated with Leptospira positivity. Age and presence of accumulated materials were positively associated with Hantavirus positivity, while rodent control campaigns and being male were protective factors. Factors associated with positivity for Leptospira are also associated with rodent infestation. Different subsets of environmental and demographic factors influence pathogens with different epidemiological characteristics. Control measures that effectively reduce zoonotic risk must consider the ecological characteristics of the pathogens present in the system.

Indexed as

environmental conditionsHantavirusLeptospiraneglected tropical diseaseRattus norvegicus

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.