ReviewPaediatric drugs2026
Managing Sjögren's Disease in Pediatric Patients.
Review in Paediatric drugs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the past decade, therapeutic development in adult Sjögren's disease (SjD) has accelerated substantially. Multiple targeted agents directed at B-cell survival, co-stimulation, autoantibody recycling, and immune regulation are advancing through late-phase clinical development. As of August 2026, there are no US Food and Drug Administration-approved disease-modifying or immunomodulatory therapies specifically indicated to treat the underlying autoimmunity of SjD. US Food and Drug Administration approvals in adults are limited to symptomatic treatment of sicca (dryness) symptoms, particularly xerostomia (dry mouth). Treatment of childhood SjD remains off-label and is supported by a limited evidence base consisting largely of case reports, case series, registry abstracts, and clinician survey data. B-cell-targeted medicines and conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs have been used off-label in SjD, including childhood SjD. In this review, we compare the clinical phenotype of childhood SjD with adult SjD, summarize the therapies currently used in children and the evidence supporting them, and propose a framework for prioritizing adult SjD therapeutics for pediatric development. The inflammatory phenotype of childhood SjD provides a strong biologic rationale for the study of selected targeted therapies, while underscoring the need for staged pediatric development, phenotype-enriched trials, and outcome measures suited to glandular and systemic disease in children. The highest-priority candidates for pediatric study are discussed based on available adult data and current approval in children for other pediatric diseases.
Identifiers
42766209What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.