ArticleSpine deformity2026
Clinical and radiographic outcomes of robotic-assisted direct pars repairs for spondylolysis.
Article in Spine deformity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpondylolysis is one of the most common identifiable causes of low back pain in young athletes. Direct pars repair offers a motion-preserving surgical option, and robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery may reduce invasiveness and improve precision compared to traditional open techniques.
methodsWe performed a single-center retrospective review of patients with symptomatic spondylolysis who underwent robotic-assisted direct pars repair from 2023 to 2025. A reference array was placed on the spinous process of the affected vertebrae through a < 2 cm midline incision, and screws were placed through a separate < 2 cm midline incision. Hydroxyapatite screws were planned using pre- or intraoperative CT or synthetic CT. Screw position was confirmed with fluoroscopy and EMG.
resultsThe study included 32 consecutive patients (mean 16 years, range 10-23) with 63 pars fractures (92% bilateral). Four patients (12%) had Grade 1 spondylolisthesis. Mean spondylolysis gap size was 1.5 mm (range 0.0-7.7 mm). Mean bilateral repair operative time was 118 min, and 27 patients (84%) were discharged same-day. Fourteen fractures had bone grafting at index surgery, and three patients (STIR negative) underwent bone grafting later for non-union. Four cases (13%) had minor perioperative complications with full resolution (anterior thigh pain/tightness, bilateral lower extremity paresthesia and transient pain that did not limit ambulation, seroma that resolved after bedside aspiration, guidewire breakage). There were no major complications or neurological injuries. At first postoperative follow-up (mean 21 days), 28 (88%) patients had complete resolution of pre-operative pain and 4 (12%) had improved pain. First CT (mean 10 weeks, n = 59 fractures) demonstrated complete union in 25 (42%), partial union in 24 (41%), and no union in 10 (17%). Among patients with delayed fracture healing requiring additional CT scans for surveillance (n = 28 fractures), final CT at a mean postoperative time of 27 weeks demonstrated complete union in 20 (71%), partial union in 3 (11%), and no union in 0 (0%). At final CT, STIR-positive fractures (n = 8) achieved 100% complete union versus 45% in STIR-negative fractures (n = 20). Screw placement matched preoperative planning in 100% of cases. One patient had a subsequent lamina fracture around the screw and will likely need revision. Twenty-nine of 32 patients (90.6%) returned to sport/baseline activity.
conclusionThis is the largest case series of spondylolysis treated with robotic-assisted direct pars repair. 100% of patients with a pre-operative STIR-positive MRI were pain-free and returned to sports. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42766204What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.