ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2026
Amniotic-Umbilical-to-Cerebral Ratio (AUCR) as a diagnostic tool for predicting adverse perinatal outcome in pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare the ability of different Doppler parameters in predicting composite adverse perinatal outcomes in women with preeclampsia. We especially aimed to analyse a possible future role of novel Doppler ratios, such as the Amniotic-Umbilical-to-Cerebral Ratio (AUCR), in a high-risk cohort, such as women suffering from preeclampsia.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted, analysing data from 151 pregnant women, consisting of 54 with preeclampsia and 97 healthy controls. Various Doppler parameters, including umbilical artery Doppler, middle cerebral artery, as well as computed ratios, such as the cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) and AUCR, were evaluated for their predictive value regarding composite adverse perinatal outcomes (CAPOs). Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of each parameter, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated.
resultsOur results showed that AUCR was the strongest predictor of composite adverse perinatal outcomes among women with preeclampsia. In comparison, AUCR showed low predictive accuracy in the low-risk cohort of healthy controls. The AUC ROC values for each Doppler parameter were calculated, with AUCR yielding an AUC value of 0.87, indicating good predictive performance.
conclusionThis study suggests that AUCR is a valuable tool for predicting composite adverse perinatal outcomes in women with preeclampsia. The findings of this investigation may lead to further studies on AUCR, but require prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.