ArticleDer Nervenarzt2026
[Nonpatient-related tasks in psychiatric hospitals : Results of a multicentre survey with real-time validation].
Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHospital staff have complained for years that documentation and administrative duties consume a large share of working time. Profession-wide data on clinical psychiatry are scarce.
objectiveTo quantify time spent on patient-distant tasks in psychiatric hospitals by category and profession, and to cross-check self-reports against a prospective real-time measurement. MATERIALS AND
methodsMulticentre cross-sectional study at four psychiatric hospitals of the LWL Psychiatry Network Westphalia (three adult psychiatry, one child and adolescent psychiatry). An anonymous questionnaire assessed 27 patient-distant tasks in six categories (n = 287 from five professional groups). An additional prospective day-by-day observation tracked n = 34 employees over 76 working days.
resultsBoth methods concurred at the aggregate level at about 61% of working time (~24 h/week, part-time-adjusted) spent on patient-distant tasks. Part-time employees were disproportionately burdened. Largest categories: internal exchange and coordination (27%), internal documentation (24%) and organization of treatment (20%); the most time-consuming single activity was patient-related team meetings (4.2 h/week). Real-time measurement yielded only 10.5% for documentation; informal short conversations emerged as an underestimated time factor.
conclusionPatient-distant tasks account for the majority of working time in psychiatric staff. Contrary to public debate, documentation is not the dominant burden; meetings and coordination weigh more heavily. Alongside political deregulation, hospitals should use internal organisational levers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42766147What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.