ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2026
Post-mortem rodent scavenging mimicking canine bite injuries on human corpse in Italy.
Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post-mortem vertebrate scavenging may produce tissue alterations that mimic ante-mortem trauma, representing a potential source of error in forensic interpretation. We report a case of extensive soft tissue loss in the face and the anterior part of the neck of a human corpse, initially attributed to a canine attack. A multidisciplinary approach, including scene investigation, autopsy, and entomological and histological analyses, was applied to determine the origin of the lesions and reconstruct the scene. First-instar larvae of Calliphora vicina (Diptera: Calliphoridae) were collected and used to estimate the minimum post-mortem interval using a thermal summation model, indicating early colonization. Macroscopic examination revealed finely serrated wound margins, parallel superficial striations, and localized tissue removal without punctures, avulsion, or crushing injuries. Histological analysis showed superficial ulceration, dermal homogenization, fragmentation of elastic fibers, and absence of vital reactions, supporting a post-mortem origin of the lesions. The combined evidence excluded canine involvement and identified rodent scavenging as the cause of tissue loss. This case highlights the diagnostic value of entomological, macroscopic and histological data in the correct estimation of time since death (minimum post-mortem interval) and interpretation of post-mortem artifacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42766104What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.