Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42766088›Full record

ReviewIrish journal of medical science2026

Neuroplasticity after traumatic brain injury: mechanisms and clinical implications.

Michael O'Connor, Shreya Sankar, Suhani Sharma, Duaa Alghazi, Vanshika Chundru, Zafer Yacoub Moh'd Zafer Al-Alem, Ryan Lukin, Esther Banjo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Irish journal of medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michael O'ConnorSchool of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Shreya SankarSchool of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Suhani SharmaSchool of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland. suhanisharma24@rcsi.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-1210-6193
Duaa AlghaziSchool of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Vanshika ChundruSchool of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Zafer Yacoub Moh'd Zafer Al-AlemSchool of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Ryan LukinSchool of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Esther BanjoSchool of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a leading cause of death and long-term neurological disability worldwide. Functional recovery after TBI depends largely on neuroplasticity, the brain's capacity for structural and functional reorganisation. While advances in acute neurocritical care have improved survival, optimising long-term outcomes requires a clearer understanding of how surgical, rehabilitative, pharmacological, neuromodulatory, and computational strategies influence plastic mechanisms across recovery phases.

aimTo synthesise current experimental and clinical evidence on the mechanisms and temporal dynamics of neuroplasticity following traumatic brain injury and to evaluate how neuroimaging and biomarkers, rehabilitation, neuromodulation, pharmacological therapies, surgical interventions, and emerging artificial intelligence-based approaches may inform or modulate functional recovery.

methodsThis narrative review integrates experimental and clinical literature addressing cellular and molecular mechanisms of plasticity, neuroimaging and electrophysiological biomarkers, rehabilitation-induced network reorganisation, neuromodulation techniques, pharmacological modulators, surgical timing, and emerging artificial intelligence (AI)-driven precision approaches in TBI care.

resultsNeuroplasticity evolves across acute, subacute, and chronic phases. Early mitigation of secondary injury preserves neural substrates necessary for adaptive reorganisation. Rehabilitation promotes experience-dependent plasticity through task-specific training and network-level recalibration. Neuromodulatory approaches, including non-invasive brain stimulation and vagus nerve stimulation, may enhance circuit responsiveness to therapy. Pharmacological agents targeting neurotrophic and inflammatory pathways show translational promise but require further validation. Advanced neuroimaging, biomarker profiling, and AI-based models improve prognostication and recovery stratification, supporting personalised, phase-specific interventions.

conclusionsOptimising TBI recovery requires coordinated, multimodal, and temporally informed strategies integrating acute stabilisation with plasticity-targeted rehabilitation and neuromodulation. Biomarker-guided precision care and computational modelling offer opportunities to shift from reactive management toward proactive orchestration of neuroplastic recovery.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceBiomarkersNeuromodulationNeuroplasticityNeurorehabilitationTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.