ArticleObesity surgery2026
Application of Machine Learning to Predict 1-Year Weight Loss Outcomes After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is an effective treatment for obesity. This study aimed to develop and internally validate machine-learning models using routinely available preoperative clinical variables to predict optimal clinical response at 1 year after LSG.
methodsThis single-center retrospective study included 621 individuals with obesity who underwent LSG between September 2021 and May 2025 and completed 1-year follow-up. Feature selection was performed using the Boruta algorithm. Five machine-learning models were developed and evaluated in a Training set and an Internal test set (7:3). Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and model interpretability was examined using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP).
resultsThe Boruta algorithm identified seven key predictors, including body mass index (BMI), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), waist circumference (WC), age, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), white blood cell count (WBC), and estradiol (E2). Among the five models, the random forest (RF) model achieved the best predictive performance, with an AUC of 0.804 (95% CI: 0.728-0.881) and an accuracy of 0.796 in the Internal test set. SHAP analysis demonstrated that BMI, FPG, age, and WC were the most influential predictors. A web-based prediction tool was subsequently developed based on the RF model.
conclusionsMachine-learning models based on routinely available preoperative variables showed potential for predicting optimal clinical response at 1 year after LSG. The RF model demonstrated the best overall performance and may assist preoperative risk assessment and patient stratification. Further external validation is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42766079What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.