Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42766077›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2026

Radiomics and machine learning for differentiating pediatric intramedullary spinal tumors: a pilot study.

Catalin George Iacoban, Shayan Alvansazyazdi, Costanza Parodi, Behnoud Shafiezadeh Kenari, Antonia Ramaglia, Claudia Mercuri, Gabriele Gaggero, Gianluca Piatelli, Claudia Milanaccio, Davide Cangelosi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Catalin George Iacoban *Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.
Shayan Alvansazyazdi *Clinical Bioinformatics Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.
Costanza ParodiNeuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.
Behnoud Shafiezadeh KenariClinical Bioinformatics Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.
Antonia RamagliaNeuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy. antonia.ramaglia@gaslini.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2998-3322
Claudia MercuriNeuro-Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.
Gabriele GaggeroPathology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.
Gianluca PiatelliNeurosurgery Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.
Claudia MilanaccioNeuro-Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.
Davide CangelosiClinical Bioinformatics Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.
Andrea RossiNeuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.

Funding

2020 5x1000 5M-2018-23680429Ministero della Salute RRC-2024-2787194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesConventional magnetic resonance imaging faces limitations in differentiating among pediatric intramedullary spinal tumors (IMSTs). We evaluated radiomics-based machine learning (ML) models using sagittal T2-weighted images to differentiate pilocytic astrocytomas (PA) and ependymomas (EP), independently, from other IMSTs. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis single-center retrospective study included pediatric patients diagnosed with IMST from 2000 to 2023. Manual tumor segmentation was performed on sagittal T2-WI, in correlation with sagittal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images using ITK-SNAP. Radiomic features were extracted using PyRadiomics. Effect size validation assessed feature analytical suitability prior to ML implementation. Three ML models with two feature selection methodologies were deployed using nested leave-one-out cross-validation. Balanced accuracy, Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), F1 score, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Youden's J, and Cohen's d were calculated.

resultsForty patients, aged 9.2 ± 5.4 years (mean ± standard deviation), 21 females, were analyzed. Tumors comprised PAs (n = 16), EPs (n = 11), gangliogliomas (n = 6), and others (n = 7). Cohen's d was 0.356 for PAs and 0.741 for EPs. PA radiomics showed inadequate capacity, resulting in suboptimal ML performance. Random forest with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) achieved superior EP classification using an average of four features (Youden's J = 0.243): balanced accuracy 0.834 (95% confidence interval: 0.723-0.955, p < 0.0001), AUC 0.838, sensitivity 0.909, specificity 0.759, PPV 0.588, NPV 0.957, and MCC 0.603.

conclusionRadiomics-based ML differentiated EPs but not PAs from other pediatric IMSTs using sagittal T2-weighted images. KEY POINTS: Question Can radiomic-based machine learning models differentiate pediatric intramedullary spinal tumors? Findings Random forest with LASSO feature selection achieved acceptable performance in distinguishing ependymomas from other IMSTs, with balanced accuracy of 0.834, AUC of 0.838, and MCC of 0.603. Relevance statement This review highlights the emerging role of time-resolved ("4D") approaches in postmortem imaging, demonstrating how integrating temporal information can enhance reconstruction of injury mechanisms, postmortem processes, and medicolegal interpretation, thereby expanding forensic radiology beyond static documentation toward process-oriented forensic investigation.

Indexed as

AstrocytomaEpendymomaMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiomicsSpinal Cord NeoplasmsAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityMachine learningNested leave-one-out cross-validationPediatric intramedullary spinal tumorsRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID42766077
PMCPMC13594037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.