ReviewVeterinary research communications2026
From laboratory to clinical application: a narrative review of bacteriophage therapy for antimicrobial-resistant infections in veterinary medicine.
Review in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance poses one of the most critical challenges to global health, particularly within veterinary medicine, where antibiotic misuse contributes significantly to multidrug-resistant infections. Bacteriophages have re-emerged as promising biocontrol agents that can target resistant pathogens while preserving host microbiota and environmental balance. However, despite growing experimental evidence, therapeutic implementation remains constrained by heterogeneous methodologies, limited clinical validation, and fragmented regulatory frameworks. This narrative review critically appraises advances in veterinary phage therapy and suggests that standardized, optimized bacteriophages may match the efficacy and biosafety of antibiotics, potentially enhancing their effectiveness in combination therapies. Latest studies report substantial pathogen reduction and, in a smaller number of cases, improved clinical outcomes in livestock (Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella enterica, Clostridium perfringens), as well as in aquaculture (Aeromonas hydrophila, Edwardsiella tarda) and apiculture (Paenibacillus larvae) models. Emerging strategies, including phage cocktails, microencapsulation, and phage-antibiotic synergy, enhance therapeutic stability but require standardized evaluation. To fully realize their potential, bacteriophage therapies must be developed within harmonized frameworks that integrate genomic surveillance, pharmacodynamic modeling, and quality-controlled production. Phage therapy should thus be viewed not as an established alternative but as a dynamic, hypothesis-driven approach capable of reshaping antimicrobial stewardship within the "One Health" paradigm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.