Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42765949›Full record

ReviewFEMS yeast research2026

Microbial ecology of fermented foods.

Anna Elizabeth Wittwer, I Nyoman Sumerta, Francesca Cristetti, Kate S Howell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEMS yeast research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna Elizabeth WittwerFaculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1212-8282
I Nyoman SumertaFaculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2663-9497
Francesca CristettiFaculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia.ORCID 0009-0006-9170-3888
Kate S HowellFaculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6498-0472

Funding

Ministry for Universities and Research CUP D13C22001330005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over thousands of years, a wide variety of food fermentations in human diets have developed in different geographical regions, cultures, and traditions. The desirable conversions of food components that occur during fermentation rely on a diverse array of microorganisms, which interact with one another and with their environments. Notably, many yeast, bacterial, and filamentous fungal taxa are key members of the microbiomes of fermented food products. Strategies employed by these microorganisms to ensure their survival typically include maximising reproductive rates, and this affects patterns of microbial succession and key metabolic dependencies. The principles of microbial ecology can be used to understand growth, activity, and interactions in these diverse communities. In this review, we summarize the historical significance and factors influencing key microbial functions in palm wine, wine, sourdough, and tempeh, selected for their varied raw materials and fermentation techniques. Despite differences, in fermented foods abiotic and environmental influences from natural or human-controlled sources act to define a food's microbial ecology and therefore the final product's properties. Modern production of traditional and novel foods by microbes should consider the principles of microbial ecology to understand and control fermentation outcomes.

Indexed as

Fermented FoodsFood MicrobiologyFungiMicrobiotaBacteriaFermentationHumansYeastsecologyfermentationyeast

Identifiers

PMID42765949
PMCPMC13618444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.