ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2026
Intraday and Interday Repeatability of Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging for Ocular Blood Flow Measurement in Healthy Subjects.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the intra- and interday repeatability of ocular blood flow velocity index (BFVi) measurements using a laser speckle contrast imaging device. Methods: BFVi measurements were obtained using XyCAM CRE (Vasoptic Medical Inc., Columbia, MD). Two imaging sessions were performed on the same day (26 eyes) and on different days (20 eyes). For optic nerve head-centered datasets, the analyzed regions included the overall field of view, the optic disc, and a standard temporal peripapillary region. For macula-centered datasets, the regions analyzed were the overall field of view, the foveal avascular zone, and the perifoveal region. For each region, heart rate-adjusted measurements of the peak, dip, and mean BFVi were assessed. Results: For intraday measurements of all the optic nerve head-centered parameters, the coefficients of variation (CVs) ranged from 4.8% to 8.5%, and the intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.74 to 0.98. For all macula-centered parameters, the CVs ranged from 4.7% to 6.2%, and the ICCs ranged from 0.93 to 0.98. For the interday measurements of all the optic nerve head-centered parameters, the CVs ranged from 7.9% to 12.6%, and the ICCs ranged from 0.56 to 0.93. For all the macula-centered parameters, the CVs ranged from 8.6% to 15.0%, and the intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.79 to 0.94. Conclusions: Laser speckle contrast imaging demonstrated strong intraday repeatability and reliability for BFVi measurement in healthy subjects, with good interday reliability for key parameters despite some variability. Translational Relevance: Laser speckle contrast imaging shows promise for clinical use in ophthalmology due to its robust intraday and good interday reliability for ocular blood flow velocity measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.