ArticleeLife2026
Enhanced tactile coding in rat neocortex under darkness.
Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sensory systems are known for their adaptability, responding dynamically to changes in environmental conditions. A key example of this adaptability is the enhancement of tactile perception in the absence of visual input. Despite behavioral studies showing visual deprivation can improve tactile discrimination, the underlying neural mechanisms, particularly how tactile neural representations are reorganized during visual deprivation, remain unclear. In this study, we explore how the absence of visual input alters tactile neural encoding in the rat primary somatosensory cortex (S1). Rats were trained on a custom-designed treadmill with distinct tactile textures (rough and smooth), and local field potentials (LFPs) were recorded from S1 under light and dark conditions. Machine learning techniques, specifically a convolutional neural network, were used to decode the high-dimensional LFP signals. We found that the neural representations of tactile stimuli became more distinct in the dark, indicating a reorganization of sensory processing in S1 when visual input was removed. Notably, conventional amplitude-based analyses failed to capture these changes, highlighting the power of deep learning in uncovering subtle neural patterns. These findings offer new insights into how the brain rapidly adapts tactile processing in response to the loss of visual input, with implications for multisensory integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.