Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42765585›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2026

Mapping Pain Memory Across Modalities: Distinct Spatial Representations of Recalled Visceral and Somatic Pain.

Catrin Guddat, Genisius Hartanto, Robert J Pawlik, Thomas Graven-Nielsen, Sigrid Elsenbruch, Jana L Aulenkamp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pain (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Catrin GuddatDepartment of Neurology, Center for Translational Neuro-and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Genisius HartantoDepartment of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Center for Medical Psychology and Translational Neurosciences, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Robert J PawlikDepartment of Neurology, Center for Translational Neuro-and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Thomas Graven-NielsenCenter for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP), Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Sigrid ElsenbruchDepartment of Neurology, Center for Translational Neuro-and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Jana L AulenkampDepartment of Neurology, Center for Translational Neuro-and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6075-1824

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRepresentation of pain areas offers a spatial dimension of pain perception, yet it has rarely been used in the context of visceral pain. This experimental study examined spatial patterns of acute visceral and somatic pain and their recall.

methodsHealthy volunteers (N = 49, 30 females) underwent calibrated rectal distension (visceral pain) and cutaneous heat stimulation on the abdomen (somatic pain), and drew modality-specific pain areas on standardised body maps immediately after stimulation and one week later. Drawings were digitised and quantified, distinguishing local from referred pain, defined as pain area separated from local site. Pain intensity and unpleasantness were assessed with visual analogue scales, psychological traits and states via questionnaires.

resultsRectal distension induced larger and more diffuse areas than heat pain (p < 0.001). Pain areas were highly reproducible after one week (p < 0.001). Referred visceral pain was reported by 67% of participants, predominantly in the anterior abdomen, whereas somatic pain remained localised. Total pain areas were unrelated to pain intensity or unpleasantness. However, participants with referred visceral pain had higher trait anxiety (p = 0.011), while greater referred visceral pain extent was associated with higher pain intensity (p = 0.012). Bayesian analyses identified extraversion and behavioural inhibition as predictors of visceral pain area.

conclusionVisceral and somatic pain showed distinct, reliably recalled spatial representations. Visceral pain was more extensive and diffuse. Its association with personality traits suggests that spatial pain representations reflect stable, trait-like characteristics, highlighting the value of body maps as complementary tool for characterising interoceptive pain in experimental and clinical research. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Visceral pain evokes a broader and more diffuse spatial representation than somatic pain, which is reliably recalled and shaped by psychological traits. Body maps capture features such as referred pain that are not reflected by intensity ratings alone. Visceral pain was predicted by personality trait factors, while referred pain extent was linked to pain intensity. These findings support modality-specific body maps as a mechanism-informed tool for stratifying visceral interoceptive pain in research and clinical contexts.

Indexed as

Mental RecallNociceptive PainPain PerceptionReferred PainVisceral PainAdultFemaleHumansMalePain MeasurementPersonalityYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42765585
PMCPMC13591659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.