ArticleBJS open2026
Environmental benefits of reintroducing reusable drapes and gowns in the operating room.
Article in BJS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe healthcare sector contributes significantly to environmental pollution, which adversely affects human health. Operating rooms are a major source of this impact, partially due to the routine use of disposable materials prepacked in surgical trays. The main objective of this study was to compare the environmental impacts of fully disposable surgical trays with those of hybrid surgical trays, which replace disposable drapes and gowns with reusable ones.
methodsThis multicentre study included surgical trays from three types of surgeries: gynaecological laparoscopy surgery, extremity surgery, and caesarean section. This selection captures a broad range of surgical workflows and instrument requirements, enabling the development of an average tray composition and enhancing the generalizability of the findings across various surgical specialties. The hybrid trays, including reusable drapes and gowns, were developed and tested specifically for this study. A life cycle assessment was conducted according to ISO 14040/44 standards to compare the environmental impacts of the hybrid and disposable trays across 18 impact categories.
resultsHybrid trays demonstrated lower environmental impacts than disposable trays across almost all impact categories. For climate change, hybrid trays reduced impact by 40-51%. In disposable trays, drapes and gowns contributed to approximately 69% of the total climate change impact, whereas in hybrid trays this contribution decreased to 38%, primarily because the production and end-of-life impacts of reusable drapes and gowns are distributed over multiple uses.
conclusionThese results provide a robust evidence base to inform and support a broader European Union-wide transition to hybrid trays, incorporating reusable drapes and gowns, in operating rooms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.