Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42765530›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2026

Sustainable quality improvement interventions to ensure adequate physician documentation of chaperone presence in breast clinic: a multicycle clinical audit.

Cian M Hehir, Gavin G Calpin, Nadia Walsh, Gordon R Daly, Gavin P Dowling, Sandra Hembrecht, Katie Kearns, Michael Allen, Abeeda Butt, Colm Power and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Cian M HehirDepartment of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-8437-1447
Gavin G CalpinDepartment of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-0266-2038
Nadia WalshDepartment of Breast, Endocrine & General Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Gordon R DalyDepartment of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Gavin P DowlingDepartment of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Sandra HembrechtDepartment of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Katie KearnsDepartment of Nursing, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Michael AllenDepartment of Breast, Endocrine & General Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Abeeda ButtDepartment of Breast, Endocrine & General Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Colm PowerDepartment of Breast, Endocrine & General Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Arnold D K HillDepartment of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCurrent best practice guidelines recommend chaperone presence during intimate clinical examination. Achieving guideline standards of documentation regarding chaperone presence has important implications from both clinical governance and medicolegal perspectives. This multicycle clinical audit provides insight into quality improvement interventions relevant to chaperone utilization and achieving guideline documentation standards. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis single-centre, multicycle quality improvement audit was performed in the setting of a tertiary breast referral clinic at Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. The quality improvement audit consisted of three audit cycles with two distinct interventions employed. Firstly, a 'chaperone stamp' was entered into the clinical notes prior to consultation to serve as a memory aid for physicians. Secondly, following transfer of clinical notes from paper-based to electronic records, a mandatory check field was introduced ensuring adequate documentation.

resultsA total of 388 female patients underwent breast examination at our centre. Despite levels of chaperone presence being directly observed at 100% in clinical consultations, chaperone documentation rates were poor (7.6%). Introduction of a chaperone stamp resulted in a 51.1% improvement in chaperone documentation. This intervention demonstrated poor sustainability as documentation standards declined by 13.6% at 6 months postintervention. Introduction of a mandatory check field using electronic patient records generated the most significant improvement in documentation standards, with 100% of clinical notes recording chaperone presence to reference standard.

conclusionAccurate documentation of chaperone presence or decline thereof is of relevance from clinical governance and medicolegal perspectives. Simple, resource-efficient interventions such as the 'chaperone stamp' demonstrate significant quality improvement potential but with questionable long-term efficacy. Electronic records present a viable opportunity for units to achieve guideline standards in a time and resource-efficient manner.

Indexed as

DocumentationMedical ChaperonesPhysical ExaminationQuality ImprovementClinical AuditFemaleHumansIrelandauditbreast examinationchaperoneelectronic patient recordsoutpatient clinicquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID42765530
PMCPMC13645422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.