ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026
Differential analysis of microbial interaction networks.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microbiome studies increasingly indicate that disease-associated shifts cannot be understood from compositional changes alone. The functional architecture of microbial communities-encoded in patterns of association among microbial gene families-may reveal how these systems reorganize across biological conditions. Here, we present a network-based framework for characterizing microbiome rewiring across conditions. The approach combines condition-specific network inference, differential network analysis, and pathway-level network analysis to identify associations that are gained, lost, or altered between groups, with a specific focus on sex-dependent differences. We apply the framework to inflammatory bowel disease, type 2 diabetes, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ACVD), comparing male and female-specific microbial gene family networks within each disease context. Across these settings, differential networks flag large numbers of candidate rewired associations; however, permutation testing (sex labels shuffled, group sizes preserved, 500 permutations for gene-family networks, and 1000 for pathway networks) shows that the global amount of apparent rewiring is not greater than expected under the null at the global or edge level in any cohort, and that most edges exclusive to one group are induced by group-specific feature filtering rather than by a genuine change in association ($\sim $80%-83% in ACVD). We therefore present the method as a rigorously validated framework and a cautionary case study: the differential-network machinery is sound, but the headline biological signal in a naive analysis is largely a property of correlation thresholding and, for the longitudinal inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) cohort, of pseudoreplication. The only non-null result across all validations is a SOHPIE-DNA per-taxon test in the IBD disease arm (15 taxa at FDR $< 0.05$), which we report as a single nominal finding requiring independent replication. Code, data, and supplementary information are available at https://github.com/mmilano87/NetMicrobiome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.