ArticleMuscle & nerve2026
Assessment of Lectin Staining Biomarkers for GNE Myopathy Gene Therapy.
Article in Muscle & nerve, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- GNE myopathy: History, etiology, and treatment trials.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/
aimsGNE myopathy (GNEM) is a rare, autosomal recessive disorder caused by mutations in the UDP-N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) 2-epimerase/N-acetylmannosamine (ManNAc) kinase (GNE) gene, which encodes a required enzyme for sialic acid (SA) biosynthesis. Reduced SA production is associated with progressive skeletal muscle wasting, but robust molecular biomarkers of SA deficiency and therapeutic restoration remain lacking. As gene therapy for GNEM continues to advance, there is a critical need for biomarkers that enable early, objective assessment of therapeutic response that may precede detectable clinical improvements. Here, we systematically compare a panel of glycan-binding lectins to identify sensitive and robust biomarkers of SA deficiency and restoration in GNEM.
methodsWe evaluated a panel of glycan-binding lectins for differential binding under altered sialylation using fluorescent staining and flow cytometry in a GNE-deficient cell model, followed by fluorescent lectin staining of skeletal muscle biopsies from GNEM and non-GNEM patients.
resultsSubterminal lectins SBA, PNA, and VVA showed greater sensitivity to hyposialylation than terminal lectins. By flow cytometry, SBA and PNA increased 90.38- and 50.03-fold, respectively, in GNE-deficient cells and decreased 96.06% and 91.83% following GNE restoration. In GNEM muscle, PNA showed the greatest increase (5.3-fold) and most consistent discrimination from non-GNEM muscle. DISCUSSION: PNA demonstrated the most robust and consistent performance across models, supporting its promise as a biomarker to reflect restoration of sialylation that would occur in skeletal muscle after GNEM gene therapy. Further validation in clinical samples will establish its utility as a pharmacodynamic biomarker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.