Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42765135›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2026

Closing the rural diabetes research gap: a case for coordinated international collaboration.

Giuliana Murfet, Wenyong Wang, Rahul D Barmanray, Ashley H Ng, Mette Juel Rothmann, Natalie Wischer, Freda Mold, Grant D Brinkworth, Wenbo Peng, Karen Pearce and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Giuliana MurfetSchool of Nursing, UTAS Health, University of Tasmania, Burnie Tasmania, Australia.
Wenyong WangSchool of Nursing, UTAS Health, University of Tasmania, Burnie Tasmania, Australia.
Rahul D BarmanrayDepartment of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Ashley H NgMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Mette Juel RothmannSteno Diabetes Center Odense, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Natalie WischerNational Association of Diabetes Centres, Australian Diabetes Society, Sydney, Australia.
Freda MoldSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
Grant D BrinkworthHealth Economics & Research Strategic Programs and Innovation, Diabetes Australia, Milton, Queensland, Australia.
Wenbo PengSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Karen PearceSchool of Nursing, UTAS Health, University of Tasmania, Burnie Tasmania, Australia.
Nicola CareySchool of Nursing, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rural, regional and remote communities experience a disproportionate burden of diabetes and persistent barriers to specialist care, including workforce shortages, geographic isolation, transport costs, fragmented services and uneven digital infrastructure. However, much of the evidence guiding diabetes service design is derived from urban settings, while rural studies are often localised, short-term and difficult to compare or scale. This article argues that addressing rural diabetes inequity requires coordinated international research rather than isolated projects or the transfer of urban models into rural contexts. It introduces the International Consortium for Rural Diabetes Research (ICRDR), an international collaboration of clinicians, researchers, health service leaders and diabetes stakeholders established to align research priorities, develop shared methodologies and outcome measures, and support multicentre and cross-jurisdictional studies. The ICRDR will initially develop community-informed research priorities involving people with lived experience, clinicians, researchers, policymakers and funders. Its longer-term agenda includes evaluating contextually appropriate models of care, digital health approaches, workforce capability and connections between primary and specialist care and supporting research capacity in low- and middle-income countries. Coordinated international research infrastructure can strengthen the relevance, implementation and scalability of rural diabetes research and support the translation of evidence into more equitable and sustainable models of care.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusHealth Services ResearchInternational CooperationRural Health ServicesDeveloping CountriesHumansRural Populationdiabetes mellitushealth equitynursingresearch consortiumRural health

Identifiers

PMID42765135
PMCPMC13600276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.