ArticleCureus2026
Analysis of Insurance Type and Emergency Severity Index (ESI) Level in an Emergency Department Population: A Single-Center Prospective Observational Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Health insurance disparities are frequently cited as contributors to inefficiencies and rising costs in the United States healthcare system. While uninsured patients have historically been assumed to delay care and present with higher acuity, the increasing prevalence of government-sponsored insurance raises questions about emergency department utilization patterns across insurance groups. Objective The objective of this study is to evaluate the association between insurance type (private, government-sponsored, and uninsured) and Emergency Severity Index (ESI) level among emergency department patients. Methods This single-day prospective observational study was conducted at Henry Ford Warren Emergency Department on December 1, 2025. An a priori power calculation determined that 167 patients were required for 80% power to detect a medium effect size (Cohen's w = 0.30, α = 0.05, df = 8). All patients assigned an ESI level (1-5) with documented insurance information were included. Insurance was categorized as private, government-sponsored, or uninsured. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and a Pearson chi-square test of independence was used to assess the association between insurance type and ESI level; Cramer's V was calculated as a measure of effect size. Results A total of 203 patient encounters met the inclusion criteria: 152 (74.9%) government-sponsored, 35 (17.2%) private, and 16 (7.9%) uninsured. ESI level 3 represented the most common triage category overall (107/203, 52.7%). ESI level 3 accounted for 69 of 152 government-sponsored patients (45.4%), 27 of 35 privately insured patients (77.1%), and 11 of 16 uninsured patients (68.8%). Pearson's chi-square analysis demonstrated no statistically significant association between insurance type and ESI level (χ²(8) = 14.27, p = 0.075; p < 0.05 was required to determine statistical significance). Cramer's V was 0.187, indicating a small effect size. Conclusions No statistically significant association was identified between insurance type and emergency department acuity, as measured by ESI level, in this single-center, single-day sample. These preliminary findings do not support insurance status alone as a predictor of presentation severity; larger, multicenter studies are needed to confirm this observation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.