Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42765090›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2026

Pedigree-based evaluation of classical, ancestral, and new inbreeding coefficients in Carora and Criollo Limonero dairy cattle populations.

Luis F Cartuche-Macas, José R Perez-Gonzalez, Ernesto J Jimenez Quintero, Anixon G Leal-González, Joar Garcia-Flores, Manuel Garcia-Herreros

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Luis F Cartuche-MacasEscuela Superior Politécnica Agropecuaria de Manabí Manuel Félix López (ESPAM), Carrera de Medicina Veterinaria, Calceta 130602, Ecuador.
José R Perez-GonzalezUniversidad Politécnica Territorial de Maracaibo (UPTM), Maracaibo 4001, Venezuela.
Ernesto J Jimenez QuinteroAsociación de Criadores de Ganado Carora (ASOCRICA), Barinas 5501, Venezuela.
Anixon G Leal-GonzálezEstación Local Carrasquero, Hacienda El Laral, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agrícolas (INIA), Carrasquero 4044, Venezuela.
Joar Garcia-FloresFacultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronomía, Universidad UTE, Quito 170147, Ecuador.
Manuel Garcia-HerrerosNational Institute for Agricultural and Veterinary Research (INIAV), Santarém 2005-424, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: Inbreeding is a major concern in livestock breeding because it can reduce genetic diversity, impair fitness, and compromise long-term population sustainability. Conventional pedigree-based inbreeding coefficients often fail to distinguish between recently accumulated inbreeding and historical ancestral inbreeding that may have undergone genetic purging. Consequently, evaluating both new and ancestral inbreeding provides a more comprehensive assessment of genetic risk. This study aimed to investigate the temporal dynamics of classical, new, and ancestral inbreeding coefficients in two native Venezuelan dairy cattle breeds, Carora and Criollo Limonero, and to compare their effective population sizes using multiple pedigree-based approaches. Materials and Methods: Pedigree records comprising 80,467 Carora cattle and 3,559 Criollo Limonero cattle born between 1984 and 2023 were analyzed. Classical, recursive, Ballou, Kalinowski (new and ancestral), and ancestral history coefficient (AHC) inbreeding estimates were calculated using GRain version 2.2 through gene-dropping simulations. Pedigree completeness, effective population size, regression analyses, and Pearson correlation analyses were performed to evaluate temporal trends, relationships among inbreeding estimators, and differences between breeds. Results: All pedigree-based inbreeding coefficients increased over time in both breeds, with ancestral inbreeding exhibiting the greatest increase. Using the AHC method, ancestral inbreeding increased from 0.26% to 8.59% in Carora cattle and from 0.13% to 4.17% in Criollo Limonero cattle. Regression analyses demonstrated significant temporal increases for all inbreeding measures (p < 0.001). Pearson correlation coefficients among inbreeding estimators ranged from 0.28 to 0.98 in Carora cattle and from 0.25 to 0.99 in Criollo Limonero cattle (p < 0.001), with the strongest associations observed between classical and new Kalinowski coefficients and between Ballou and AHC estimates. Effective population size varied substantially according to the estimation method, with ancestral Kalinowski estimates producing the largest values and AHC the smallest. Despite its considerably larger pedigree, the Carora breed exhibited consistently higher ancestral inbreeding than the Criollo Limonero breed. Conclusion: Pedigree purging approaches provided substantially greater insight into long-term genetic diversity than conventional pedigree inbreeding coefficients alone. The marked accumulation of ancestral inbreeding, particularly in the Carora breed, indicates that classical methods may underestimate genetic risk in native Venezuelan dairy cattle. Integrating ancestral and new inbreeding estimators into breeding and conservation programs could improve mating strategies, preserve genetic diversity, and support the long-term sustainability of locally adapted cattle populations. Future studies incorporating genomic information are warranted to validate pedigree-based evidence of genetic purging and optimize conservation management.

Indexed as

ancestral inbreedingCarora cattleconservation geneticsCriollo Limoneroeffective population sizegenetic diversitypedigree analysispedigree purging

Identifiers

PMID42765090
PMCPMC13590184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.