Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42765084›Full record

ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2026

External Validation and Bayesian Forecasting of Rivaroxaban Population Pharmacokinetic Models in Older Chinese Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.

Jiale Chen, Weikun Huang, Guoquan Chen, Bangbiao Ge, Qiang Zhao, Haiping Wang, Jiahao Ye, Jianing Pan, Kaili Mao

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jiale Chen *Department of Pharmacy, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0005-3959-6416
Weikun Huang *Department of Pharmacy, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, NHC Key Laboratory of Cancer Metabolism, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-7466-1405
Guoquan Chen *Department of Pharmacy, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-8385-5199
Bangbiao GeInformation Center, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, People's Republic of China.
Qiang ZhaoDepartment of Cardiology, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0004-0144-4866
Haiping WangDepartment of Pharmacy, Longyan Second Hospital, Longyan, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-7502-4021
Jiahao YeSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jianing PanDepartment of Stomatology, Huzhou Normal University, Huzhou, People's Republic of China.
Kaili MaoDepartment of Pharmacy, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0001-1556-4365

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) models have been developed to characterize rivaroxaban exposure; however, their transferability across different clinical populations remains uncertain. This study aimed to externally evaluate published rivaroxaban PopPK models in older Chinese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and assess whether Bayesian forecasting could improve individual concentration prediction. Methods: Six published rivaroxaban PopPK models were evaluated using an independent cohort from the RIVA-GAP study. Predictive performance was assessed using prediction error metrics reflecting bias, precision, and prediction coverage, together with normalized prediction distribution error (NPDE) diagnostics. Bayesian forecasting was performed using paired steady-state trough-peak concentrations to evaluate changes in individual peak concentration prediction. Results: A total of 135 patients with 257 rivaroxaban concentration observations were included for external validation, and 122 patients with paired trough-peak samples were included for Bayesian forecasting. Predictive performance varied substantially among the six models, and none consistently met predefined acceptance criteria. Model A showed comparatively lower prediction bias among the evaluated models but still demonstrated limited precision (MDPE 33.64%, MDAPE 53.72%, F30 31.52%). Bayesian forecasting reduced the MDIPE of Model A from 33.64% to 12.38%, but MAIPE remained 37.33% and IF30 was 41.8%. Similar model-dependent effects were observed across the other models. Conclusion: Published rivaroxaban PopPK models demonstrated heterogeneous transferability in older Chinese patients with NVAF. Bayesian forecasting using a single trough concentration provided modest and model-dependent improvement in concentration prediction but did not consistently overcome limitations of the underlying models. Clinical Trial/Study Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2300074934; registered 21 August 2023.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationFactor Xa InhibitorsModels, BiologicalRivaroxabanAgedAged, 80 and overBayes TheoremChinaEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansMaleFactor Xa InhibitorsRivaroxabanatrial fibrillationbayesian forecastingexternal validationolder patientspopulation pharmacokineticsrivaroxaban

Identifiers

PMID42765084
PMCPMC13590000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.