ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2026
External Validation and Bayesian Forecasting of Rivaroxaban Population Pharmacokinetic Models in Older Chinese Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.
Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) models have been developed to characterize rivaroxaban exposure; however, their transferability across different clinical populations remains uncertain. This study aimed to externally evaluate published rivaroxaban PopPK models in older Chinese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and assess whether Bayesian forecasting could improve individual concentration prediction. Methods: Six published rivaroxaban PopPK models were evaluated using an independent cohort from the RIVA-GAP study. Predictive performance was assessed using prediction error metrics reflecting bias, precision, and prediction coverage, together with normalized prediction distribution error (NPDE) diagnostics. Bayesian forecasting was performed using paired steady-state trough-peak concentrations to evaluate changes in individual peak concentration prediction. Results: A total of 135 patients with 257 rivaroxaban concentration observations were included for external validation, and 122 patients with paired trough-peak samples were included for Bayesian forecasting. Predictive performance varied substantially among the six models, and none consistently met predefined acceptance criteria. Model A showed comparatively lower prediction bias among the evaluated models but still demonstrated limited precision (MDPE 33.64%, MDAPE 53.72%, F30 31.52%). Bayesian forecasting reduced the MDIPE of Model A from 33.64% to 12.38%, but MAIPE remained 37.33% and IF30 was 41.8%. Similar model-dependent effects were observed across the other models. Conclusion: Published rivaroxaban PopPK models demonstrated heterogeneous transferability in older Chinese patients with NVAF. Bayesian forecasting using a single trough concentration provided modest and model-dependent improvement in concentration prediction but did not consistently overcome limitations of the underlying models. Clinical Trial/Study Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2300074934; registered 21 August 2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.