ReviewCureus2026
Self-Administered Dietary Supplements, Herbal Products, and Ergogenic Aids Before Plastic Surgery: A Narrative Review and the PLASTIC-S Perioperative Management Framework.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The autonomous consumption of dietary supplements, high-dose vitamins, herbal products, ergogenic aids, and "natural" weight-loss preparations has increased substantially among candidates for plastic surgery. In Brazil, this pattern is amplified by a large market of compounded (manipulado) formulas that may contain undeclared active ingredients, by gym-oriented prohormones and selective androgen receptor modulators, and by the expanding access to cannabidiol products since the regulatory changes introduced by the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA) in 2019 and 2022. These substances are frequently omitted during the preoperative interview because patients do not perceive them as medications, yet several of them have been associated, to varying degrees, with perioperative concerns such as increased bleeding, hemodynamic instability under anesthesia, cytochrome P450-mediated interactions, and impaired wound healing. This narrative review synthesizes the available evidence and proposes a plastic-surgery-specific, clinically applicable framework built on two elements: the PLASTIC-S structured anamnesis mnemonic, which organizes self-administered substances into eight categories mapped to perioperative risk mechanisms, and a two-dimensional Procedure × Supplement Risk Matrix, which translates that assessment into individualized, graduated suspension intervals rather than a single flat recommendation. Procedures are stratified into four risk tiers and supplements into four risk tiers, whose intersection yields suggested suspension intervals ranging from none to about three weeks, together with a group of substances that are best avoided altogether. The framework is intended to move everyday practice beyond the generic "suspend two weeks before" advice toward a more individualized and reproducible approach, and it can be incorporated as a low-cost component of the preoperative safety routine in contemporary Brazilian plastic surgery. As a narrative review, its recommendations rest largely on pharmacological reasoning, case reports, and consensus rather than on prospectively validated evidence, and the PLASTIC-S framework should therefore be regarded as a proposed clinical tool requiring prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.