ArticlePublic health weekly report2026
Joint Epidemiological Investigation Results of the Canine Brucellosis Outbreak at a Breeding Facility Associated with a Human Brucellosis Case, 2025.
Article in Public health weekly report, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Canine brucellosis, caused by Methods: Interviews assessed symptoms, facility visits, and dog contact; blood culture results were reviewed. Of 99 dogs at the facility, 85 aged ≥6 months underwent serologic and culture testing. Fifty-eight puppies distributed during the previous 6 months were traced, and 34 final owners were monitored for 24 weeks after their last exposure. Results: The patient intermittently visited the facility and had contact with dogs. Her asymptomatic spouse had a negative blood culture on April 29, 2025. Of 85 dogs tested, 11 (12.9%) were positive (n=10) or suspected positive (n=1), representing at least 11.1% of all 99 dogs; Conclusions: Transmission to the patient was likely from infected dogs or infectious materials. Detection of infected dogs in all breeding units highlights the limitations in early recognition. Testing newly introduced and breeding dogs, prompt diagnosis after reproductive abnormalities, and stronger information sharing between human and animal health sectors are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.