ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2026
Estimating State-Level Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Incidence and Prevalence Among Women in the United States, 2019-2023: Mathematical Modeling Analysis.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Estimates of chlamydia and gonorrhea prevalence and incidence have typically focused on national-level epidemiology. Disaggregated estimates are useful for local public health decision making. Methods: We developed a bayesian hierarchical modeling framework to estimate the incidence and prevalence of chlamydia and gonorrhea for women in the United States. The model was calibrated to indicators from different data sources, including state- and age-specific laboratory test positivity (data pooled over 2019-2023) and diagnosis rates (average of 2019-2023). At the national level, we calibrated to chlamydia prevalence and test coverage. We used the model to estimate state- and national-level prevalence, incidence, and screening rates among women by state and age (15-24, 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, ≥55 years). Results: For women aged 15 to 24 years, national-level chlamydia prevalence was estimated at 4.6% (95% uncertainty interval, 4.2%-4.9%), gonorrhea prevalence was 0.4% (0.4%-0.5%), and testing coverage was 33.4% (33.1%-33.7%). Across states, corresponding chlamydia incidence estimates were 1.9 to 3.1 times as high as observed diagnosis rates; gonorrhea incidence estimates were 3.3 to 4.7 times as high as diagnosis rates. Chlamydia prevalence in women aged 15 to 24 years ranged from 2.3% to 7.8% across states, and chlamydia incidence ranged from 2.8% to 12.4%. Gonorrhea prevalence ranged from 0.09% to 1%, and gonorrhea incidence ranged from 0.5% to 6.0%. Conclusions: This study presents a new analytic framework for estimating incidence and prevalence at the state level. By integrating laboratory, diagnosis, and survey data, we provide more granular, actionable estimates of sexually transmitted infection burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.