ArticleCureus2026
Implementation of a Locally Deployed Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct Pipeline for Structured Classification of Elbow MRI Reports.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for radiology report extraction, but many published applications lack the implementation details needed for reproducibility. This technical report provides a complete implementation-level description of a locally deployed LLM pipeline for structured classification of radiology reports. We describe a report classification system built around Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, an open-weight instruction-tuned LLM served through a local Ollama runtime rather than a cloud application programming interface, and applied to a corpus of 10,222 elbow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reports. The report details the complete processing workflow, including report ingestion and column resolution, cohort-defining pattern matching, batch construction and threaded execution, the structured prompt used to generate two binary classification labels per report, output parsing, single-retry failure handling, and statistical routines used to summarize extracted data. To document the implementation comprehensively, we also describe the creation of an independently reviewed reference set of 400 reports, including reviewer blinding and file-separation procedures, as well as configuration factors that may influence reproducibility in locally deployed LLM workflows, including model quantization, sampling temperature, runtime version, and practical approaches for controlling these variables. This report is intended as a standalone technical reference that enables readers to understand, reproduce, evaluate, or adapt the described pipeline for related musculoskeletal or radiology report extraction tasks without requiring access to the original codebase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.