ReviewInternational journal of women's health2026
Prognostic Factors and Predictive Models for Reproductive Outcomes in Patients with Intrauterine Adhesions: A Review.
Review in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This narrative review first summarizes current treatment strategies and postoperative prevention measures for intrauterine adhesions (IUAs), then discusses prognostic factors associated with pregnancy outcomes and recent advances in predictive models for patients with IUAs. The degree, location, and type of adhesions significantly affected pregnancy outcomes after natural conception. Patients with severe adhesions had poorer reproductive outcomes than those with mild or moderate adhesions. Following transcervical resection of adhesions (TCRA), clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were influenced by endometrial thickness, recovery of endometrial function, surgical technique, and the interval between surgery and embryo transfer. Classification systems and statistical prediction models demonstrated predictive value, including the Nasr classification, decision tree models, and assessment of endometrial glandular orifice density. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based models integrating imaging and clinical data demonstrated superior predictive performance compared with traditional approaches. Although TCRA remains the standard treatment, objective intraoperative evaluation methods and standardized operative protocols are still lacking. The development and application of AI-assisted surgical systems remain at the exploratory stage. Recovery of uterine cavity anatomy, severity of adhesions, and previous surgical history influence therapeutic efficacy and pregnancy outcomes in patients with IUAs. To optimize reproductive prognosis, postoperative monitoring, assessment of endometrial receptivity, and individualized assisted reproductive protocols should be integrated into clinical management. These approaches may facilitate early identification of high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.