Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42764962›Full record

ArticlePsychology research and behavior management2026

Cosmeticorexia in Adolescence: A Case Report and Psychodynamic Formulation.

Alberto Stefana, Giovanni Damiani

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology research and behavior management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alberto StefanaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4807-7184
Giovanni DamianiDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical, and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2390-6505

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cosmeticorexia is a provisional descriptive label, not a DSM-5-TR or ICD-11 diagnosis, for impairing skin-focused preoccupation and excessive cosmetic routines. It overlaps with body dysmorphic disorder (BDD); its proposed emphasis is a culturally sanctioned product ritual that may cause objective skin damage. The psychodynamic formulation offered here is interpretive and hypothesis-generating. Case Presentation: The patient was a 14-year-old girl referred after recurrent periocular dermatitis, burning, and acneiform eruptions associated with cosmetic overuse. She applied 10-12 products before school, avoided school when use was restricted, repeatedly checked and sought reassurance about skin flaws, and spent 4-5 hours daily viewing and comparing skincare content. Diagnostic Assessment and Intervention: Dermatological assessment identified irritant contact dermatitis and acne medicamentosa. The BDDQ-DV screen was positive; clinician-derived BABS (19/24) and BDD-YBOCS-A (38/48) ratings reconstructed from routine interviews descriptively suggested marked preoccupation, repetitive behavior, avoidance, and poor insight. They were non-diagnostic, and no structured psychiatric interview was conducted. Care combined skin-barrier repair and routine simplification with psychological formulation. Conclusion: This case illustrates an impairing BDD-like presentation in which cosmetic behavior and skin injury reinforced one another. It does not validate cosmeticorexia as a distinct diagnosis or establish a psychodynamic mechanism. The findings support integrated dermatological and mental health assessment while avoiding pathologization of normative adolescent grooming.

Indexed as

acne medicamentosaadolescencebody dysmorphic disordercase reportcontact dermatitiscosmeticorexiapsychodynamic

Identifiers

PMID42764962
PMCPMC13589966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.