ArticlePsychology research and behavior management2026
Cosmeticorexia in Adolescence: A Case Report and Psychodynamic Formulation.
Article in Psychology research and behavior management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cosmeticorexia is a provisional descriptive label, not a DSM-5-TR or ICD-11 diagnosis, for impairing skin-focused preoccupation and excessive cosmetic routines. It overlaps with body dysmorphic disorder (BDD); its proposed emphasis is a culturally sanctioned product ritual that may cause objective skin damage. The psychodynamic formulation offered here is interpretive and hypothesis-generating. Case Presentation: The patient was a 14-year-old girl referred after recurrent periocular dermatitis, burning, and acneiform eruptions associated with cosmetic overuse. She applied 10-12 products before school, avoided school when use was restricted, repeatedly checked and sought reassurance about skin flaws, and spent 4-5 hours daily viewing and comparing skincare content. Diagnostic Assessment and Intervention: Dermatological assessment identified irritant contact dermatitis and acne medicamentosa. The BDDQ-DV screen was positive; clinician-derived BABS (19/24) and BDD-YBOCS-A (38/48) ratings reconstructed from routine interviews descriptively suggested marked preoccupation, repetitive behavior, avoidance, and poor insight. They were non-diagnostic, and no structured psychiatric interview was conducted. Care combined skin-barrier repair and routine simplification with psychological formulation. Conclusion: This case illustrates an impairing BDD-like presentation in which cosmetic behavior and skin injury reinforced one another. It does not validate cosmeticorexia as a distinct diagnosis or establish a psychodynamic mechanism. The findings support integrated dermatological and mental health assessment while avoiding pathologization of normative adolescent grooming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.