ReviewJournal of hepatocellular carcinoma2026
Current Perspectives on the Use of Adjuvant Pembrolizumab for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Review in Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite implementation of surveillance in at-risk populations and the availability of potentially curative treatment such as resection or ablation, recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a frequent clinical challenge driven by both occult residual disease and de novo carcinogenesis, and can have a major impact on patients' quality of life. Current evidence does not support adjuvant therapy after curative treatment in early-stage HCC, and active surveillance remains the standard of care. Following the historical failure of adjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitors, the integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced HCC treatment has renewed interest in their application in the curative-intent setting, particularly for their potential to eradicate microscopic residual disease. Preliminary evidence on adjuvant PD-1-based combinations supported the plausibility of immune modulation, although most of today's evidence derives from retrospective heterogeneous cohorts including multiple anti-PD-1 agents. Pembrolizumab, a monoclonal anti-PD-1 antibody that restores antitumor T-cell activity, has recently attracted growing interest on the postoperative management of early- and intermediate-stage HCC. KEYNOTE-937 was a Phase III trial comparing pembrolizumab to placebo after curative treatment whose results failed to demonstrate improvement in recurrence-free survival. This outcome suggested that postoperative PD-1 blockade alone may be insufficient to prevent tumor relapse, especially without proper selection on residual disease or treatment sensitivity. Conversely, pembrolizumab-based strategies administered in the neoadjuvant or perioperative setting remain underexplored. As persistence of tumor antigens with intact tumor burden may offer a more favorable immunological context, this setting may be better suited for enhancing antitumor immune priming. In conclusion, the negative findings of KEYNOTE-937 provide a useful foundation for refining future PD-1-based strategies in HCC. Progress will require integration of molecular residual disease assessment with pathological risk stratification and liver disease etiology, in order to identify patients with immunologically targetable residual disease who may derive meaningful benefit from adjuvant pembrolizumab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.