ArticleCureus2026
Development and Evaluation of the Joseph-RATA (Rubrics Ask-Tell-Ask) Structured Feedback Model in Undergraduate Pharmacology.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEffective feedback is central to competency-based medical education (CBME), yet structured formats for delivering formative feedback remain uncommon in many undergraduate settings. At our institution, students reported dissatisfaction with existing feedback practices, which were largely limited to the communication of marks without actionable guidance. A transparent, standardized, and learner-centered feedback framework aligned with CBME principles was therefore required.
objectiveThe objective of this study is to develop, validate, and implement a structured feedback method for formative assessment in undergraduate pharmacology and to evaluate the perceptions of students and faculty regarding its use.
methodsThis prospective interventional study was conducted over six months in the Department of Pharmacology at Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, India. All students of the 2023 and 2024 MBBS batches (n = 200) were included. A structured Rubric-Ask-Tell-Ask (RATA) feedback model was developed by a departmental core committee, validated by Medical Education Unit members and by students of the 2022 MBBS batch, and implemented across six formative assessments. Perceptions were assessed using a 14-item Likert-type questionnaire, a single binary recommendation item, focus group discussions with students, and semi-structured interviews with faculty. Quantitative data were summarized using descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were analyzed thematically.
resultsDissatisfaction with the previous feedback practice was reported by 168 of 200 students (84.0%), with a mean item score of 2.02 ± 0.69 out of 5. After implementation of the structured model, students reported consistently positive perceptions across all evaluated domains following implementation of the structured feedback model. Continuation of the model was recommended by 193 of 200 students (96.5%). All five participating faculty members endorsed continuation, with a mean faculty rating of 4.69 out of 5. Qualitative themes included improved clarity of performance expectations, transparency in marking, facilitation of self-directed learning, and acceptability of the model within large-group teaching.
conclusionsThe Joseph-RATA structured feedback model demonstrated high acceptability, feasibility, and perceived educational value among both students and faculty, supporting its integration into competency-based undergraduate curricula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.