ArticleCureus2026
Intestinal Malrotation in Adults: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study Based on Computed Tomography Findings.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose Intestinal malrotation is an uncommon congenital anomaly that may remain clinically silent until adulthood and is increasingly detected incidentally on computed tomography (CT). Classical radiologic markers have limited diagnostic sensitivity in adults. This study evaluated the prevalence and CT characteristics of intestinal malrotation in a large adult cohort using strict CT-based diagnostic criteria. Methods A retrospective cross-sectional review of 3,478 abdominal CT scans performed between June 2023 and April 2025 was conducted. All examinations were screened for features suggestive of rotational anomalies. Suspected cases underwent a two-stage verification process by two independent radiologists. Classification as intestinal malrotation required assessment of the predominant jejunal location, cecal position, and duodenal course. Prevalence estimates and proportions were calculated with Wilson 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Intestinal malrotation was identified in seven of 3,478 CT examinations (0.20%; 95% CI: 0.10%-0.42%). Two additional cases demonstrated atypical bowel positioning but did not fulfill the predefined primary diagnostic criteria and were excluded. The mean age of the confirmed cases was 64 ± 14 years. Gastrointestinal alarm symptoms occurred in 28.6% (two of seven) of patients, while most cases were asymptomatic. One patient presented with fatal intestinal obstruction. Conclusions Adult intestinal malrotation was uncommon and frequently detected incidentally in this CT cohort. Systematic assessment of multiple anatomical parameters may improve diagnostic confidence, as isolated anatomical deviations may mimic malrotation. These findings should be interpreted cautiously because the diagnoses were based exclusively on CT criteria, and the number of confirmed cases was small.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.