Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42764852›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Intestinal Malrotation in Adults: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study Based on Computed Tomography Findings.

Natalia Denisiewicz, Miłosz Korbaś, Dominika Kaczyńska, Adam Mitręga, Zofia Mandrela, Jakub Kufel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Natalia DenisiewiczDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, POL.
Miłosz KorbaśDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, POL.
Dominika KaczyńskaDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, POL.
Adam MitręgaDepartment of Biophysics, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, POL.
Zofia MandrelaDepartment of Radiodiagnostics and Radiology, Professor Kornel Gibiński University Clinical Center, Katowice, POL.
Jakub KufelDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine and Department of Radiodiagnostics and Invasive Radiology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, POL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Intestinal malrotation is an uncommon congenital anomaly that may remain clinically silent until adulthood and is increasingly detected incidentally on computed tomography (CT). Classical radiologic markers have limited diagnostic sensitivity in adults. This study evaluated the prevalence and CT characteristics of intestinal malrotation in a large adult cohort using strict CT-based diagnostic criteria. Methods A retrospective cross-sectional review of 3,478 abdominal CT scans performed between June 2023 and April 2025 was conducted. All examinations were screened for features suggestive of rotational anomalies. Suspected cases underwent a two-stage verification process by two independent radiologists. Classification as intestinal malrotation required assessment of the predominant jejunal location, cecal position, and duodenal course. Prevalence estimates and proportions were calculated with Wilson 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Intestinal malrotation was identified in seven of 3,478 CT examinations (0.20%; 95% CI: 0.10%-0.42%). Two additional cases demonstrated atypical bowel positioning but did not fulfill the predefined primary diagnostic criteria and were excluded. The mean age of the confirmed cases was 64 ± 14 years. Gastrointestinal alarm symptoms occurred in 28.6% (two of seven) of patients, while most cases were asymptomatic. One patient presented with fatal intestinal obstruction. Conclusions Adult intestinal malrotation was uncommon and frequently detected incidentally in this CT cohort. Systematic assessment of multiple anatomical parameters may improve diagnostic confidence, as isolated anatomical deviations may mimic malrotation. These findings should be interpreted cautiously because the diagnoses were based exclusively on CT criteria, and the number of confirmed cases was small.

Indexed as

abdominal imagingadult populationcomputed tomographycongenital anomaliesintestinal malrotation

Identifiers

PMID42764852
PMCPMC13589831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.