Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42764849›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

From Regression to Vision Transformers: A Narrative Review of Predictive Modelling in Dental Implantology and the Gap Between Algorithmic Performance and Clinical Adoption.

Akash Gopi, Vishwa Deepak Singh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Akash GopiProsthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Teerthanker Mahaveer Dental College and Research Centre, Moradabad, IND.
Vishwa Deepak SinghProsthodontics, Teerthanker Mahaveer Dental College and Research Centre, Moradabad, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predictive modelling has moved from simple regression equations to deep, image-native architectures capable of localising an implant position on a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan with sub-millimetre precision. Yet the discipline that builds these models and the clinicians who would use them appear, on current evidence, to occupy different timelines. This narrative review synthesises comparative performance data across traditional statistical, machine learning, and deep learning approaches to dental implant prognostication; situates these methods within the broader literature on prediction-model validation and reporting; and juxtaposes this technical trajectory against field survey data describing how practising dentists actually perceive and use predictive and digital tools. The synthesis suggests that while deep learning architectures now substantially outperform logistic regression and Cox models on discrimination metrics, routine clinical uptake remains constrained less by algorithmic ceiling and more by validation gaps, interpretability concerns, and infrastructural readiness at the chairside.

Indexed as

clinical adoptiondeep learningdental implantologydental implantsimplant stability quotientmachine learningprediction modelstripod-aivision transformer

Identifiers

PMID42764849
PMCPMC13589823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.