ReviewCureus2026
From Regression to Vision Transformers: A Narrative Review of Predictive Modelling in Dental Implantology and the Gap Between Algorithmic Performance and Clinical Adoption.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predictive modelling has moved from simple regression equations to deep, image-native architectures capable of localising an implant position on a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan with sub-millimetre precision. Yet the discipline that builds these models and the clinicians who would use them appear, on current evidence, to occupy different timelines. This narrative review synthesises comparative performance data across traditional statistical, machine learning, and deep learning approaches to dental implant prognostication; situates these methods within the broader literature on prediction-model validation and reporting; and juxtaposes this technical trajectory against field survey data describing how practising dentists actually perceive and use predictive and digital tools. The synthesis suggests that while deep learning architectures now substantially outperform logistic regression and Cox models on discrimination metrics, routine clinical uptake remains constrained less by algorithmic ceiling and more by validation gaps, interpretability concerns, and infrastructural readiness at the chairside.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.