ArticleCureus2026
Scarring Patterns in Cutaneous Sporotrichosis: Clinical and Therapeutic Correlations.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundZoonotic sporotrichosis caused by Sporothrix brasiliensis has emerged as a major public health problem in Brazil, with a growing burden of cutaneous sequelae. However, scarring outcomes remain poorly characterized, particularly regarding specific morphological patterns and clinical factors that influence tissue repair.
methodsThis retrospective descriptive-analytical study included patients with cutaneous sporotrichosis treated at a tertiary referral dermatology center between January 2017 and June 2024. Scars were evaluated individually according to trophism (atrophic, normotrophic, hypertrophic) and specific morphology (linear, "wax drop", or nonspecific), as well as anatomical site, clinical form, presence of inoculation chancre, orientation in relation to skin tension lines and use of cryotherapy. Statistical analyses were performed using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA), with confirmatory re-analysis in Python 3 (SciPy 1.x).
resultsA total of 45 patients (29 (64.4%) female; mean age 35.9 ± 23.8 years) and 202 scars were analyzed. Most scars were located on the upper limbs (162, 80.2%). Overall, 104 (51.5%) were atrophic, 91 (45.0%) hypertrophic, and 7 (3.5%) normotrophic; 43 (21.3%) showed a linear pattern and 37 (18.3%) a 'wax drop' pattern. At the scar level, trophism was associated with the presence of an inoculation chancre (p = 0.00026) and with a lesion axis parallel to skin tension lines (p < 0.001); the association with clinical form (p = 0.0018) was driven by the seven normotrophic scars and did not extend to hypertrophic scarring (p = 0.67). Thirty-eight scars (18.8%), arising from six patients, were treated with cryotherapy: atrophic scars were proportionally more frequent at the scar level (28 (73.7%) vs. 76 (46.3%); p = 0.0076), but this was not confirmed with the patient as the unit of analysis (59.4% vs. 45.2%; p = 0.45), nor was treatment duration shorter (30.8 vs. 18.8 weeks; p = 0.27). Because scars were unevenly clustered within patients, scar-level p-values are descriptive.
conclusionsCutaneous sporotrichosis is associated with a substantial scar burden, frequently with distinctive linear and 'wax drop' patterns; the linear arrangement on the upper limbs may be mistaken for self-inflicted injury and is the most directly actionable observation of this series. The presence of an inoculation chancre and a lesion axis parallel to skin tension lines were associated with hypertrophic scarring at the scar level, whereas differences associated with cryotherapy were not confirmed at the patient level and should not be interpreted as evidence of a therapeutic effect. Prospective studies with clustering-adjusted analyses are needed to validate these observations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.