ArticleJournal of the experimental analysis of behavior2026
Renewal of spatial response distributions in rats.
Article in Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Renewal of spatial response distributions in rats.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Operant renewal refers to the relapse of eliminated behavior as a function of context change. Two experiments were performed to assess operant renewal effects in rat subjects with different response location criteria. In both experiments, subjects were trained to respond to a variable-interval schedule on an array of five levers. For Experiment 1, in Context A, only responses on the middle lever were reinforced. For these subjects, response distributions formed a generalization gradient around the middle lever. For Experiment 2, responses on any lever could meet the reinforcement criteria. In this case, the response distribution across levers varied between subjects but was consistent within subjects across time. During both experiments, responding was next extinguished in Context B, which increased variability in response distributions. The reintroduction of Context A decreased variability levels. For most rats in Experiment 1 and some rats in Experiment 2, the pattern of responding during testing was more similar to the pattern during training than to the pattern at the end of extinction. The results suggest that renewed response distributions across locations varied as a function of the initial training conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.