Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42764630›Full record

ArticleChemSusChem2026

Effect of SiO

Katherine Stephanie Encalada-Flores, Koen de Graaf, Athina Tzavara-Roussi, Bhavesh Chavan, Philipp Brüner, Thomas Grehl, J Ruud van Ommen, Ruud Kortlever

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ChemSusChem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Katherine Stephanie Encalada-FloresProcess and Energy Department, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5783-5211
Koen de GraafProcess and Energy Department, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
Athina Tzavara-RoussiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3969-0964
Bhavesh ChavanDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7733-105X
Philipp BrünerIONTOF GmbH, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2495-3220
Thomas GrehlIONTOF GmbH, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1591-8490
J Ruud van OmmenDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7884-0323
Ruud KortleverProcess and Energy Department, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9412-7480

Funding

Rijksdienst voor Ondernemend Nederland
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proton exchange membrane water electrolysis for green hydrogen production is typically designed for ultrapure water feeds. In offshore applications, for example, when coupled to desalination, residual chloride can still trigger the chlorine evolution reaction (CER), motivating the development of oxygen evolution reaction (OER)-selective anodes. Silicon oxide (SiO

Indexed as

acidic saline water electrolysischlorine evolution reactionfabrication–functionality relationshipoxygen evolution reactionsilicon oxide nanocoatings

Identifiers

PMID42764630
PMCPMC13591069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.