ArticleJournal of nursing management2026
Diagnostic Entropy as an Administrative Measure of Cross-System Diagnostic Dispersion in Noncommunicable Disease Inpatients: A Methodological Validation Study.
Article in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExisting comorbidity indices such as the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) summarise comorbidity burden but do not capture how a patient's diagnoses are distributed across clinical speciality domains, a dimension hypothesised to relate to cross-system care coordination demands. This gap limits their utility for nursing workforce planning in settings with high multimorbidity prevalence.
aimThis study aimed to provide preliminary evidence for the construct validity of diagnostic entropy as an administrative measure of cross-system diagnostic dispersion, by testing its incremental predictive value for prolonged hospitalisation, beyond diagnosis count and the CCI.
methodsA retrospective methodological validation study used inpatient discharge records from a tertiary hospital in southwest China, 2023-2025 (n = 31,470). Diagnostic entropy was calculated using the Shannon entropy formula applied to ICD-10 chapter distributions across each patient's valid diagnoses. Four nested binary logistic regression models were fitted with LOS > 10 days as the primary outcome. Four sensitivity analyses examined robustness to extreme LOS values, coding inclusion rules, insurance-type stratification and repeat admissions from the same patient.
resultsDiagnostic entropy had a mean of 1.746 (SD: 0.569); 72.3% of patients were in the high-entropy group (H ≥ 1.5). Entropy showed low-to-moderate correlation with the CCI (Spearman r = 0.304, p < 0.001) and moderate correlation with diagnosis count (r = 0.544, p < 0.001), suggesting that entropy captures a related but nonequivalent aspect of comorbidity-related complexity. After controlling for demographic characteristics, diagnosis count and CCI, entropy remained independently associated with prolonged hospitalisation (OR = 1.112, 95% CI: 1.072-1.153, p < 0.001), with an incremental Nagelkerke R
conclusionsThese findings contribute discriminant evidence toward the construct validity of diagnostic entropy as an administrative measure of cross-system diagnostic dispersion. Whether this dispersion translates into greater nursing coordination burden remains a hypothesis requiring prospective validation. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Diagnostic entropy, calculated from routinely collected discharge diagnoses, may offer nurse managers a low-cost, scalable indicator of cross-system diagnostic dispersion among NCD inpatients. Wards with a higher proportion of high-entropy patients could potentially require greater coordination across speciality teams, though this application awaits prospective, multicentre validation linking entropy to nursing-sensitive outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.