ArticleClinical epigenetics2026
Epigenetic clocks can differentiate between exogenous and endogenous skin ageing.
Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextWhereas factors originating internally to the body, such as blood nutrients and hormones, influence endogenous skin ageing, exogenous skin ageing results from the penetration of harmful factors through the skin's outer stratum corneum layer.
aimTo test whether an exogenous skin ageing epigenetic clock is more strongly associated with aspects of sun-exposure than two endogenous epigenetic clocks.
methodsExogenous and endogenous skin clocks were trained in more than 400 skin samples. These two clocks and the Horvath 'Skin and Blood' epigenetic clock were tested for association with chronological age and, whilst controlling for chronological age (age acceleration), sun-exposure parameters and skin gene expression.
resultsExogenous Skin clock ages were significantly (p<0.001) older in both epidermal (n=24) and cultured fibroblast (n=8) sun-exposed arm samples than in donor matched sun-protected samples. Exogenous Skin clock age acceleration was significantly correlated (Rho = 0.18, p = 0.004) with sun-seeking behaviour and mRNA levels (202 genes had q < 0.05) in whole skin abdomen samples (n=364); the latter was consistent with sun-exposed versus sun-protected older arm mRNA differences (n=12 donors). In 44 facial skin swabs, exogenous age acceleration was also significantly correlated with facial photodamage grading (rho = 0.33, p = 0.028). Although the Endogenous and Skin and Blood clocks were more strongly correlated with chronological age, their age acceleration estimates were not significantly associated with sun-exposure parameters or mRNA levels in skin.
conclusionSkin epigenetic clocks can differentiate exogenous from endogenous skin ageing facilitating further study of the mechanisms underlying these two skin ageing phenomena.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.