ReviewEmergency radiology2026
Computed tomography findings associated with gangrenous cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Emergency radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gangrenous cholecystitis (GC) is a severe form of acute cholecystitis associated with perforation, sepsis, and increased mortality. Although computed tomography (CT) is useful for evaluating complicated cholecystitis, the relative diagnostic value of individual CT findings for identifying GC remains unclear. This review aimed to evaluate the association between individual CT findings and histopathologically confirmed GC and to summarize the diagnostic performance of these findings for preoperative assessment. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Ichushi-Web, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to March 1, 2026, and also screened Google Scholar for eligible studies. Eligible studies included those that enrolled patients with acute cholecystitis who underwent CT and had GC confirmed histopathologically. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality using the QUADAS-2 tool. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were calculated with a DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. When 2 × 2 data were available, we estimated pooled sensitivity and specificity using a bivariate random-effects model fitted by restricted maximum likelihood, from which we derived likelihood ratios and their confidence intervals; we examined model stability in sensitivity analyses. Ten retrospective studies involving 786 patients (310 GC and 476 non-GC) were included; eight studies (724 patients; 268 GC and 456 non-GC) contributed to the quantitative synthesis and two to the qualitative synthesis only. Absent gallbladder wall enhancement (OR 10.23, 95% CI 5.67-18.46) and wall irregularity (OR 10.26, 95% CI 5.80-18.17) were strongly associated with GC, as was pericholecystic stranding (OR 4.82, 95% CI 1.76-13.24). Absent wall enhancement (sensitivity 0.49, specificity 0.91, positive likelihood ratio 5.65) and wall irregularity (sensitivity 0.43, specificity 0.94, positive likelihood ratio 7.14) both combined high specificity with moderate sensitivity; their confidence intervals overlapped, and the findings were not compared directly. Pooled estimates were robust to the assumed between-study correlation and to omitting individual studies. Absent wall enhancement, wall irregularity, and pericholecystic inflammatory changes are useful CT findings for the preoperative assessment of suspected GC. Because the available evidence derives from surgically treated cohorts and the findings were not compared directly, these results should be regarded as hypothesis-generating and warrant prospective validation in unselected patients undergoing CT for suspected acute cholecystitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42764326What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.