Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42764278›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

An ab initio foundation model of wavefunctions that accurately describes chemical bond breaking.

Adam Foster, Zeno Schätzle, P Bernát Szabó, Lixue Cheng, Jonas Köhler, Gino Cassella, Nicholas Gao, Jiawei Li, Frank Noé, Jan Hermann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Adam Foster *Microsoft Research AI for Science, Cambridge, UK. adam.e.foster@microsoft.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1624-7481
Zeno Schätzle *Microsoft Research AI for Science, Cambridge, UK.
P Bernát Szabó *Microsoft Research AI for Science, Cambridge, UK.
Lixue Cheng *Microsoft Research AI for Science, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7329-0585
Jonas KöhlerMicrosoft Research AI for Science, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7256-2892
Gino CassellaMicrosoft Research AI for Science, Cambridge, UK.
Nicholas GaoMicrosoft Research AI for Science, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1487-2657
Jiawei LiMicrosoft Research AI for Science, Cambridge, UK.
Frank NoéMicrosoft Research AI for Science, Cambridge, UK. franknoe@microsoft.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4169-9324
Jan HermannMicrosoft Research AI for Science, Cambridge, UK. jan.hermann@microsoft.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2779-0749

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliable description of bond breaking remains a major challenge for quantum chemistry due to the multireference character of the electronic structure in dissociating species. Multireference methods in particular suffer from large computational cost, which under the normal paradigm has to be paid anew for each system at a full price, ignoring commonalities in electronic structure across molecules. Quantum Monte Carlo with deep neural networks uniquely offers to exploit such commonalities by pretraining transferable wavefunction models, but all such attempts were so far limited in scope. Here, we bring this paradigm to fruition with Orbformer, a transferable wavefunction model pretrained on 22,000 equilibrium and dissociating structures that can be fine-tuned on unseen molecules reaching an accuracy-cost ratio rivalling classical multireference methods. On established benchmarks as well as more challenging bond dissociations and Diels-Alder reactions, Orbformer is the only method that consistently converges to chemical accuracy (1 kcal/mol). This work turns the idea of amortizing the cost of solving the Schrödinger equation over many molecules into a practical approach in quantum chemistry.

Identifiers

PMID42764278
PMCPMC13590640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.