Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42764265›Full record

ReviewClinical transplantation and research2026

Redefining post-xenotransplantation surveillance: leveraging metagenomic next-generation sequencing to discriminate true pathogen replication from microchimerism-induced false positives.

Hyeri Seok

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical transplantation and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hyeri SeokDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2032-9538

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infection-related risks remain a major concern in xenotransplantation and require continued vigilance as the field progresses toward clinical application. Xenozoonosis is of particular concern, especially in relation to donor-derived porcine viruses such as porcine endogenous retroviruses, porcine cytomegalovirus, porcine lymphotropic herpesviruses, and porcine circoviruses, which are considered significant targets for donor screening and recipient surveillance in clinical xenotransplantation trials. With advances in diagnostic technologies, metagenomic next-generation sequencing may facilitate the detection of unexpected or previously unrecognized pathogens. However, positive molecular findings for donor-derived pathogens should be interpreted cautiously to distinguish microchimerism from true infection in the recipient. Addressing this diagnostic challenge will require complementary assays capable of demonstrating viral integration and replication in recipient-derived human cells, together with expert interpretation by clinicians in the appropriate clinical context. Detailed and tailored surveillance protocols incorporating these advanced methodologies should be developed and validated through well-designed clinical trials, with the resulting evidence guiding their standardization by relevant professional societies and regulatory authorities. These efforts will be essential for the safe and responsible clinical implementation of xenotransplantation.

Indexed as

MicrochimerismNext-generation sequencingXenotransplantationZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID42764265
PMCPMC13654637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.