ReviewClinical transplantation and research2026
Redefining post-xenotransplantation surveillance: leveraging metagenomic next-generation sequencing to discriminate true pathogen replication from microchimerism-induced false positives.
Review in Clinical transplantation and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infection-related risks remain a major concern in xenotransplantation and require continued vigilance as the field progresses toward clinical application. Xenozoonosis is of particular concern, especially in relation to donor-derived porcine viruses such as porcine endogenous retroviruses, porcine cytomegalovirus, porcine lymphotropic herpesviruses, and porcine circoviruses, which are considered significant targets for donor screening and recipient surveillance in clinical xenotransplantation trials. With advances in diagnostic technologies, metagenomic next-generation sequencing may facilitate the detection of unexpected or previously unrecognized pathogens. However, positive molecular findings for donor-derived pathogens should be interpreted cautiously to distinguish microchimerism from true infection in the recipient. Addressing this diagnostic challenge will require complementary assays capable of demonstrating viral integration and replication in recipient-derived human cells, together with expert interpretation by clinicians in the appropriate clinical context. Detailed and tailored surveillance protocols incorporating these advanced methodologies should be developed and validated through well-designed clinical trials, with the resulting evidence guiding their standardization by relevant professional societies and regulatory authorities. These efforts will be essential for the safe and responsible clinical implementation of xenotransplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.