Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42764257›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2026

Disparity in the distribution of suitable habitat as a metric for capturing responses to contrasting land-use types.

Joscha Beninde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Disparity in the distribution of suitable habitat as a metric for capturing responses to contrasting land-use types.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Joscha BenindeAmsterdam Institute for Life and Environment (A-LIFE), Section Ecology and Evolution, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global species observations from community science platforms offer an unprecedented opportunity to analyze large-scale patterns of biodiversity. This holds great promise for developing data-driven metrics to measure species' responses to landscape-level environmental changes, essential for ameliorating the ongoing biodiversity crisis. A primary cause of declines in local populations of native species is the expansion and intensification of anthropogenic land uses, foremost urbanization. While species' responses to urbanization can remain consistent across spatial and temporal scales, city-specific factors, such as land-use dynamics or local biotic interactions, can profoundly influence populations and shift responses. This underscores the importance of measuring responses to urbanized landscapes at the local population level and the need for a quantitative method to track changing responses as they occur. For this purpose, I propose applying the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and its associated area under the curve (AUC), a well-established continuous summary metric. Specifically, the novel habitat disparity (HD) metric quantifies variation in the spatial distribution of suitable habitat between two contrasting land-use types. Applying it here to a highly urbanized landscape, HD

Indexed as

EcosystemUrbanizationAnimalsBiodiversityModels, Biologicalecological niche modelingglobal environmental changehabitat suitabilitylandscape changerange shiftsspecies distribution modelingspecies distribution patternsUrban biodiversityUrbannessUrban tolerance

Identifiers

PMID42764257
PMCPMC13590416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.