ArticleCancer medicine2026
Development and Validation of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Early Pulmonary Metastasis Risk in Osteosarcoma.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPulmonary metastasis in high-grade conventional osteosarcoma remains a leading cause of treatment failure and mortality. Traditional monitoring methods are insufficient for early detection. This study aims to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) model using multi-dimensional data from electronic medical records (EMR) to predict the early risk of pulmonary metastasis in high-grade conventional osteosarcoma patients.
methodsThis retrospective study included data from 522 high-grade conventional osteosarcoma patients. After rigorous feature selection, 12 independent predictive factors were identified: prothrombin time (PT), international normalized ratio (INR), fibrinogen, globulin, prognostic nutritional index (PNI), eosinophil percentage, monocyte percentage, neutrophil percentage, monocyte count, maximum tumor diameter, gender, and amputation status. Eleven ML models were constructed and compared, with Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis applied to enhance model interpretability and clinical transparency.
resultsThe gradient boosting model exhibited superior performance, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.891 in the training set and 0.742 in the independent test set. SHAP analysis revealed that tumor maximum diameter was the most influential predictor of pulmonary metastasis risk, while inflammation and coagulation-related indicators also demonstrated significant contributions. DISCUSSION: The gradient boosting model effectively predicts the early risk of pulmonary metastasis in high-grade conventional osteosarcoma and provides interpretable risk factors. This model shows potential as a clinical decision support tool, facilitating personalized risk management and precision medicine, aiming to improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.