ArticlePharmaceutical statistics
Bayesian Power-Based Sample Size Determination for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.
Article in Pharmaceutical statistics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In diagnostic accuracy studies, it is crucial to estimate the required sample size beforehand for the appropriate evaluation of diagnostic measures (e.g., sensitivity and/or specificity). In the development of pharmaceuticals and medical devices, although frequentist approaches have been used for sample size determination, Bayesian approaches have gained attention recently. We propose a Bayesian method for sample size determination using two kinds of priors (i.e., analysis prior and design prior) based on "Bayesian power." In the proposed method, an analysis prior and a design prior were introduced for the sensitivity and/or specificity parameters and a design prior for the prevalence parameter. For each possible future dataset at a given sample size, the analysis prior was updated to calculate the posterior probability of satisfying a prespecified success criterion. The design priors were used to obtain the prior predictive distribution of the future data, and Bayesian power was calculated as the prior predictive probability of satisfying the success criterion. Sample size determination was performed by evaluating Bayesian power over a range of candidate sample sizes according to a prespecified criterion. Numerical results showed that, under the parameter settings considered, the required sample size generally decreased as uncertainty in the design priors decreased when their means were above the corresponding target values. With the effective sample size of the analysis prior fixed, a more optimistic analysis prior reduced the required sample size. We also evaluated the method for joint sensitivity and specificity criteria and performed comparisons with commonly used frequentist methods. These results demonstrate how uncertainty represented by the design priors and information represented by the analysis prior affect Bayesian power and the required sample size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.