Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42763802›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2026

Implications of a fuel spill in the Bering and Chukchi Seas for two sentinel marine species: A simulation study.

Susannah P Woodruff, Ryan R Wilson, Irina S Trukhanova, Deborah P French-McCay, Matthew Frediani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Implications of a fuel spill in the Bering and Chukchi Seas for two sentinel marine species: A simulation study.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Susannah P WoodruffMarine Mammals Management, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.
Ryan R WilsonMarine Mammals Management, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7740-7771
Irina S TrukhanovaMarine Mammals Management, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.
Deborah P French-McCayRPS Ocean Science, Tetra Tech Inc., South Kingstown, Rhode Island, USA.
Matthew FredianiRPS Ocean Science, Tetra Tech Inc., South Kingstown, Rhode Island, USA.

Funding

Bureau of Land ManagementU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sea-ice decline has opened Arctic shipping routes lengthening the maritime transit season. Along the Northern Sea Route (NSR), vessel traffic is projected to increase primarily from natural resource development-related traffic. The NSR traverses the range of the Chukchi Sea (CS) polar bear (Ursus maritimus) subpopulation, and Pacific walrus (Odobenus rosmarus divergens) haulouts dot Russian islands and mainland, the Alaska coast, and the Bering Strait along the NSR. Oil spills are a primary threat to marine Arctic wildlife from maritime traffic with the potential to affect many individuals. We estimated the number of polar bears and walruses potentially exposed to oil from a CS or Bering Strait ship-based spill. We simulated five large-scale boat-based spills in two NSR locations in August and October for crude and marine gas oil (MGO). We overlaid polar bear radio collar locations onto trajectories to estimate the number exposed. If oil was ≤0.5 nm from a haulout, we deemed the haulout exposed. We report the most impactful scenario to help managers and emergency responders understand the upper levels of impact to these species and inform response planning. Crude oil remained on the surface for the entire 60-day simulations and >20% stranded onshore. Little surface MGO remained after 5 days or reached the shoreline. The Chukchi October crude spill exposed 24% of radio-collared polar bears to lethal and sublethal oil, or 711 (95% CI = 438-1052) individuals as a proportion of the total population (n = 2937). During the Chukchi August crude spill, oil exposure occurred at ≥0.50 probability at four walrus haulouts. No polar bears or walrus haulouts were exposed to lethal levels of MGO from a spill. Our simulations suggest an oil spill would contaminate large areas of the marine environment and could have significant consequences for polar bears and walruses. The inability to conduct timely, effective cleanup underscores the importance of understanding and attempting to mitigate an Arctic oil spill. Spill preparation is expensive, time-consuming, and increasingly challenging geopolitically, yet a lack of preparation could have catastrophic consequences to marine life, regional subsistence users, and the fishing and tourism industries.

Indexed as

Petroleum PollutionSentinel SpeciesUrsidaeWalrusesWater Pollutants, ChemicalAlaskaAnimalsArctic RegionsComputer SimulationEnvironmental MonitoringModels, BiologicalOceans and SeasRussiaShipsWater Pollutants, ChemicalBering StraitChukchi SeaNorthern Sea Routeoil spillPacific walrus (Odobenus rosmarus)polar bear (Ursus maritimus)Russia

Identifiers

PMID42763802
PMCPMC13589909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.